Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41134117›Full record

ArticleJMIR AI2025

Development and Evaluation of a Retrieval-Augmented Generation Chatbot for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery Patient Education: Mixed-Methods Study.

David Baur, Jörg Ansorg, Christoph-Eckhard Heyde, Anna Voelker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David BaurDepartment for Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, Leipzig, Saxony, 04103, Germany, 49 3419723000, 49 3419723009.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8602-617X
Jörg AnsorgProfessional Association for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery (BVOU), Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8949-8420
Christoph-Eckhard HeydeDepartment for Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, Leipzig, Saxony, 04103, Germany, 49 3419723000, 49 3419723009.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9083-4062
Anna VoelkerDepartment for Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, Leipzig, Saxony, 04103, Germany, 49 3419723000, 49 3419723009.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2715-5438

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Large language models are increasingly applied in health care for documentation, patient education, and clinical decision support. However, their factual reliability can be compromised by hallucinations and a lack of source traceability. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances response accuracy by combining generative models with document retrieval mechanisms. While promising in medical contexts, RAG-based systems remain underexplored in orthopedic and trauma surgery patient education, particularly in non-English settings. Objective: This study aimed to develop and evaluate a RAG-based chatbot that provides German-language, evidence-based information on common orthopedic conditions. We assessed the system's performance in terms of response accuracy, contextual precision, and alignment with retrieved sources. In addition, we examined user satisfaction, usability, and perceived trustworthiness. Methods: The chatbot integrated OpenAI's GPT language model with a Qdrant vector database for semantic search. Its corpus consisted of 899 curated German-language documents, including national orthopedic guidelines and patient education content from the Orthinform platform of the German Society of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery. After preprocessing, the data were segmented into 18,197 retrievable chunks. Evaluation occurred in two phases: (1) human validation by 30 participants (orthopedic specialists, medical students, and nonmedical users), who rated 12 standardized chatbot responses using a 5-point Likert scale, and (2) automated evaluation of 100 synthetic queries using the Retrieval-Augmented Generation Assessment Scale, measuring answer relevancy, contextual precision, and faithfulness. A permanent disclaimer indicated that the chatbot provides general information only and is not intended for diagnosis or treatment decisions. Results: Human ratings indicated high perceived quality for accuracy (mean 4.55, SD 0.45), helpfulness (mean 4.61, SD 0.57), ease of use (mean 4.90, SD 0.30), and clarity (mean 4.77, SD 0.43), while trust scored slightly lower (mean 4.23, SD 0.56). Retrieval-Augmented Generation Assessment Scale evaluation confirmed strong technical performance for answer relevancy (mean 0.864, SD 0.223), contextual precision (mean 0.891, SD 0.201), and faithfulness (mean 0.853, SD 0.171). Performance was highest for knee and back-related topics and lower for hip-related queries (eg, gluteal tendinopathy), which showed elevated error rates in differential diagnosis. Conclusions: The chatbot demonstrated strong performance in delivering orthopedic patient education through an RAG framework. Its deployment on the national Orthinform platform has led to more than 9500 real-world user interactions, supporting its relevance and acceptance. Future improvements should focus on expanding domain coverage, enhancing retrieval precision, and integrating multimodal content and advanced RAG techniques to improve robustness and safety in patient-facing apps.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence in healthcareclinical decision support systemshealth information retrievallarge language modelsLLMmedical chatbotsnatural language processingNLPorthopedic patient educationRAGretrieval-augmented generation

Identifiers

PMID41134117
PMCPMC12551339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.