Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41134033›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2025

EssSubgraph improves performance and generalizability of mammalian essential gene prediction with large networks.

Haimei Wen, Susan Carpenter, Karen McGinnis, Andrew Nelson, Keriayn Smith, Tian Hong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haimei WenDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-1600-1210
Susan CarpenterDepartment of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5600-5404
Karen McGinnisDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32303-4295, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9564-8146
Andrew NelsonBoyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9896-1739
Keriayn SmithSchool of Data Science and Society, Department of Genetics, RNA Discovery Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4351-2765
Tian HongDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8212-7050

Funding

Modeling transcriptional and post-transcriptional systems for regulating non-genetic heterogeneity in mammalian cellsR35GM149531 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI Tian Hong · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
National Science Foundation 2243562NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM149531NIH HHS R35GM149531
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPredicting essential genes is important for understanding the minimal genetic requirements of organisms, identifying disease-associated genes, and discovering potential drug targets. Wet-lab experiments for identifying essential genes are time-consuming and labor-intensive. Although various machine learning methods have been developed for essential gene prediction, both systematic testing with large collections of gene knockout data and rigorous benchmarking for efficient methods are very limited to date. Furthermore, current graph-based approaches require learning the entire gene interaction networks, leading to high computational costs, especially for large-scale networks.

resultsTo address these issues, we propose Essential Gene Prediction with Subgraphs (EssSubgraph), an inductive representation learning method that integrates graph-structured network data with omics features for training graph neural networks. We used comprehensive lists of human essential genes distilled from the latest collection of knockout datasets for benchmarking. When applied to essential gene prediction with multiple types of biological networks, EssSubgraph achieved superior performance compared to existing graph-based and other models. The performance is more stable than other methods with respect to network structure and gene feature perturbations. Because of its inductive nature, EssSubgraph also enables predicting gene functions using dynamical networks with unseen nodes, and it is scalable with respect to network sizes. Finally, EssSubgraph has better performance in cross-species essential gene prediction compared to other methods.

conclusionsOur results show that EssSubgraph effectively combines networks and omics data for accurate essential gene identification while maintaining computational efficiency. The source code and datasets used in this study are freely available at https://github.com/wenmm/EssSubgraph.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksGenes, EssentialMammalsSoftwareAlgorithmsAnimalsHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerCRISPRGene function predictionGene regulatory networkGraph neural networkSubgraph

Identifiers

PMID41134033
PMCPMC12690466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.