ArticleGigaScience2025
Ultra-deep long-read metagenomics captures diverse taxonomic and biosynthetic potential of soil microbes.
Article in GigaScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perseus: lineage-aware refinement of Kraken2 taxonomic classification for long read metagenomes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Microbiome-mediated chemical communication in insects: Implications for pest management.Pest management science · 2026Review
- Unveiling the Taxonomic Diversity and Unprecedented Biosynthetic Treasure of the Phylum Myxococcota.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Review
- Systematic Assessment of the Impact of Targeted Selection Methods and Environment-Mimicking Culture Conditions on Fungal Natural Product Libraries.Journal of natural products · 2026Article
- Whole metagenome sequencing: not deep enough for complete microbial function recovery.Microbiome · 2026Article
- Choosing Between Short-Read 16S, Full-Length ONT 16S, and Long-Read Shotgun Metagenomics for Soil Microbiome Studies: A Critical Review of the Benchmarking Evidence.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- 16S rRNA sequence captures microbial functional potential.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Genome-resolved metagenomics reveals co-selection of antibiotic and metal resistance in chronically polluted industrial soils.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Discovery and Heterologous Expression of the Soil Metagenome-Derived Lasso Peptide Metanodin with an Unprecedented Ring Structure.Journal of natural products · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSoil ecosystems have long been recognized as hotspots of microbial diversity, but most estimates of their microbial and functional complexity remain speculative despite decades of study, in part because conventional sequencing campaigns lack the depth and contiguity required to recover low-abundance and repetitive genomes. Here, we revisit this question using one of the deepest metagenomic sequencing efforts to date, applying 148 billion basepairs of Nanopore long-read data and 122 billion basepairs of Illumina short-read data to a single forest soil sample.
resultsOur hybrid assembly reconstructed 837 metagenome-assembled genomes, including 466 that meet high- and medium-quality standards, nearly all lacking close relatives among cultivated taxa. Rarefaction and k-mer analyses reveal that, even at this depth, we capture only a fraction of the extant diversity: nonparametric models project that more than 10 trillion basepairs of sequencing data would be required to approach saturation. These findings offer a quantitative, technology-enabled update to long-standing diversity estimates and demonstrate that conventional metagenomic sequencing efforts likely miss most microbial and biosynthetic potential in soil. We further identify more than 11,000 biosynthetic gene clusters, over 99% of which have no match in current databases, underscoring the breadth of unexplored metabolic capacity.
conclusionsTaken together, our results emphasize both the power and the present limitations of metagenomics in resolving natural microbial complexity, and they provide a new baseline for evaluating future advances in microbial genome recovery, taxonomic classification, and natural product discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.