Trial reportOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2025
Deep learning-empowered low-cost portable automated refraction system: A solution to the inadequate effective correction rate of refractive errors in resource-limited areas.
Trial report in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning-empowered low-cost portable automated refraction system: A solution to the inadequate effective correction rate of refractive errors in resource-limited areas.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo develop and validate a low-cost, portable automated refraction system (Tongren Digital Sight, TRDS) using deep learning and infrared eccentric photorefraction to improve refractive error correction in resource-constrained settings.
methodsThis randomised controlled crossover trial enrolled 282 participants (18-60 years of age) at Beijing Tongren Hospital. TRDS utilised low-cost components (complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) detector, infrared light emitting diodes) and an end-to-end deep learning model trained on 362,000 images to analyse fundus reflection signals. Primary outcomes included agreement between TRDS and subjective refraction (gold standard) via Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for spherical equivalent (M), horizontal (J
resultsTRDS showed strong correlations with subjective refraction: M (r = 0.96, ICC = 0.96), J
conclusionsThe deep learning-empowered TRDS system demonstrated high accuracy and portability. It offers a scalable solution to improve refractive error correction rates, aligning with WHO goals to enhance global eye health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.