Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41133962›Full record

ArticleMolecular pain

The butterfly effect and its electrical mechanism: Non-linear non-reciprocate sawtooth subthreshold oscillations deactivate nociceptors.

M Danilo Boada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pain. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M Danilo BoadaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8973-3010

Funding

Nociceptor Maturation &Response to Peripheral InjuryR01NS044094 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING · PI WOODBURY, CHARLES JEFFERY · 2002 to 2013
$2.5M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS044094NINDS NIH HHS R01NS113852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across mammalian evolution, chronic pain has no adaptive value, and in the wild, there's no evidence of its existence. Since rodents are often used to model chronic pain in humans, the question of how the peripheral somatosensory system of these animals responds to injury becomes critical to our overall translatability efforts. Over a decade of intensive work on this question has led to the discovery of the primordial systemic process that protects the mammalian peripheral somatosensory system against uncontrolled hyperexcitability, as well as its underlying electrical mechanism. Named the "butterfly effect," this two-stage process enables the appropriate animal behavioral response to injury (first stage) while evading pathology by deactivating hyperactive nociceptive neurons (second stage). This deactivation process involves the generation of subthreshold membrane sawtooth oscillations, which, rather than producing ectopic discharges, lead the cells to a quiescent state. The complex nature of this phenomenon challenges any simplistic approach to modeling and translating animal pain physiology directly into human pain pathology.

Indexed as

NociceptorsNonlinear DynamicsAnimalsHumansmechano-receptorsOscillationspainpolymodalitysomatosensory system

Identifiers

PMID41133962
PMCPMC12705952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.