ArticleBioTechniques
Standardizing caloric restriction for preclinical cancer research.
Article in BioTechniques. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite increasing rates of metabolic syndrome, cancer treatment regimens often ignore the underlying metabolic dysfunction in patients. A high proportion of cancer patients have metabolic dysfunction, and caloric restriction has shown the potential to improve cancer treatment response. However, preclinical efficacy is hindered by inconsistent protocols. We demonstrated that a CR (caloric restriction) diet enhances radiotherapy outcome by promoting apoptosis and downregulating cell survival pathways in mice. However, CR animal models implementation greatly differs in previous cancer studies, hindering its clinical translation. Here, we propose an effective CR protocol that safely achieves a 30% caloric reduction in two weeks. Week one involves single housing the mice and taking individual caloric intake measurements across four days. Week two involves weaning the mice to a 30% reduction by reducing their caloric intake by 10% every other day, which allows for a safe reduction. This protocol integrates individualized intake measurement, gradual weaning, and real-time monitoring-features rarely combined in prior models-offering a reproducible and translationally relevant framework for cancer studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.