ArticlePsychology and psychotherapy2026
Therapy without faith: Muslim clients' experience of religious exclusion and minimisation in therapy.
Article in Psychology and psychotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceived barriers and pathways to religious inclusion: UK Muslim clients' perspectives on faith in therapy.Psychology and psychotherapy · 2026Article
- Therapy without faith: Muslim clients' experience of religious exclusion and minimisation in therapy.Psychology and psychotherapy · 2026Article
- Beyond cultural competence: a qualitative analysis of psychologists' experiences with Muslim clients in South Africa.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Christian religion and spirituality in eating disorder development, experience, and recovery: an exploration of lived experience in Australia and New Zealand.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe integration of religious beliefs is considered an essential component of evidence-based practice; however, clients from faith-based communities frequently report that their beliefs are overlooked in therapy. While existing research primarily centres on therapists' perspectives, there is limited understanding of how Muslim clients themselves make sense of therapy when their religious identity is not acknowledged, particularly within mental health systems often grounded in Western psychological models. This study, therefore, aimed to explore the mental healthcare experiences of Muslim therapy users in the UK who received therapy where their religion was perceived as minimised or excluded, despite its personal significance.
designA qualitative approach was adopted, underpinned by a critical realist epistemology. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 25 Muslim participants, aged 18-56 years. These interviews were conducted remotely via Teams and subsequently transcribed for analysis. Data analysis was performed using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsThree overarching themes were generated through the analysis: feeling powerless and unseen when attempting to bring Islam, shaking my foundation and feeling compelled to choose between my faith or therapy. Participants described a significant emotional impact when Islam was excluded or minimised.
conclusionThese findings highlight the need for therapists to actively explore and integrate clients' religious worldviews, and for services to consider culturally responsive practices. The findings also suggest a need for enhanced cultural competence training and systemic changes to improve the therapeutic experience for Muslim clients. This study offers insight for developing more inclusive and effective mental health practices as well as implications for clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.