ArticleThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2026
Determining Thyroid Biopsy Appropriateness: A Retrospective Study Integrating Clinical Context and Ultrasound Features.
Article in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextThyroid nodules are common in clinical practice, and inappropriate selection of patients for thyroid biopsy can contribute to thyroid cancer overdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis.
objectiveThis work aimed to evaluate the frequency of inappropriate thyroid biopsies in practice, following a framework that integrates thyroid nodule ultrasound (US) features and patient-specific clinical factors.
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted at a single academic center in the United States. Participants included adult patients who underwent their first thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2023, at the University of Florida. Data collection included thyroid US characteristics, clinical factors (eg, comorbidities, patient preferences), and context for biopsy decision-making. Main outcome measures included the appropriateness of thyroid biopsy assessed using a tiered framework incorporating US features and additional clinical factors.
resultsA total of 899 patients were evaluated, with 441 meeting the inclusion criteria and undergoing 481 thyroid biopsies. Of these, 388 of 481 (80.7%) were classified as likely appropriate (L-APP) based on the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria. In 34 of 481 (7%) of cases, clinical factors such as thyroid cancer risk features, comorbidities, symptoms, or patient preferences led to reclassification from likely inappropriate (L-INAP) to L-APP. In 50 of 481 (10%) of cases, limited life expectancy (eg, chemotherapy, end-stage disease) led to reclassification from L-APP to possibly or extremely inappropriate (EXT-INAP). EXT-INAP biopsies occurred in only 0.8% (4/481) of cases.
conclusionThis study underscores the value of integrating US findings with clinical context to guide thyroid biopsy decisions and enhance patient-centered care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.