Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41133708›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of neonatal screening2025

Methodological and Procedural Considerations for Developing Decision Analytic Models to Assess the Health Economic Impacts of Newborn Bloodspot Screening: A Systematic Methodological Review.

Jim Chilcott, Alice Bessey, James R Bonham, Iván Castilla-Rodríguez, Sarah Davis, David Elliman, Sara Hunt, Chris Hyde, Silvia Lombardo, Jason Madan and 10 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of neonatal screening, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Jim ChilcottSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1231-7817
Alice BesseySheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7677-0309
James R BonhamSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-9485-6754
Iván Castilla-RodríguezDepartamento de Ingenieria Informática y de Sistemas, Universidad de La Laguna, 38200 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3933-2582
Sarah DavisSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6609-4287
David EllimanGreat Ormand Street Hospital, London WC1N 3JH, UK.
Sara HuntAlex-The Leukodystrophy Charity London, London SE15 5EB, UK.
Chris HydeHealth and Community Sciences, The University of Exeter, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK.
Silvia LombardoUKNSC Secretariat, London SW1H 0EU, UK.ORCID 0009-0005-3669-4707
Jason MadanWarwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4316-1480
John MarshallUKNSC Secretariat, London SW1H 0EU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6239-774X
Joan MorrisPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7164-612X
Katherine PayneDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3938-4350
Oliver Rivero-AriasNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2233-6544
Bethany ShinkinsWarwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Graham ShortlandCardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff CF14 4XW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8994-8468
Susan SpillaneHealth Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), T12 Y2XT Cork, Ireland.
Anthea SuttonSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.
Sian Taylor-PhillipsWarwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Cristina VisintinUKNSC Secretariat, London SW1H 0EU, UK.ORCID 0009-0006-4250-2924

Funding

UK National Screening Committee, hosted by the UK Department for Health and Social Care Not Applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This methodological review identifies challenges in the development of health economic evaluations of newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) interventions and their consideration in NBS policy making. A systematic review of health economics methodological studies in NBS and stakeholder consultation was undertaken. The intervention under examination was defined as health economic decision analytic modelling used as decision support to NBS policy makers. An iterative search strategy was used to identify studies, and a data extraction framework was based upon a simple decision analytic model structure for the NBS decision problem. Synthesis was facilitated by two stakeholder workshops, which focused on ensuring the complete identification of challenges and developing recommendations. Sixteen methodological studies were identified. Data were extracted on challenges in decision criteria, decision variables, decision problem scope, defining model structure, selecting modelling method, the target condition, the screening test/protocol, outcome nodes, and other categories. Recommendations are made concerning supporting NBS decision making, NBS economic model structure and methods, data and estimation of model parameters, and overarching considerations. Recommendations for decision processes and methods research are put forward for the consideration of NBS policy makers and commissioners of research.

Indexed as

costs and cost analysiseconomicneonatal screeningnewborn bloodspot screeningnewborn screening

Identifiers

PMID41133708
PMCPMC12550984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.