Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41133706›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2025

Next-Generation Sequencing for Cystic Fibrosis: Florida Newborn Screening Experience.

Deanna M Green, Jean Polasky, Mark Weatherly, Heather Stalker, Colleen Blanchard, Cheryl Kushner, Marisa Couluris, Patricia Ryland, Iruvanti Sunitha, Joseph Fong and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Deanna M GreenDivision of Pediatric Pulmonology and Cystic Fibrosis, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-1728-8359
Jean PolaskyDivision of Pediatric Pulmonology and Cystic Fibrosis, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-0665-2463
Mark WeatherlyDivision of Pulmonology and Sleep Medicine, Orlando Health Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children, Orlando, FL 32806, USA.
Heather StalkerDivision of Pediatric Genetics and Metabolism, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5712-7286
Colleen BlanchardCoastal Genetic Services, St. Augustine, FL 32080, USA.
Cheryl KushnerPulmonary and Sleep Center, Joe DiMaggio Children's Hospital, Hollywood, FL 33021, USA.
Marisa CoulurisDivision of Pediatric Pulmonology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Patricia RylandNewborn Screening Laboratory, Florida Department of Health, Bureau of Public Health Laboratory, Jacksonville, FL 32202, USA.
Iruvanti SunithaNewborn Screening Laboratory, Florida Department of Health, Bureau of Public Health Laboratory, Jacksonville, FL 32202, USA.
Joseph FongNewborn Screening Laboratory, Florida Department of Health, Bureau of Public Health Laboratory, Jacksonville, FL 32202, USA.
Sandra CrumpNewborn Screening Follow-Up Program, Florida Department of Health, Tallahassee, FL 32399, USA.
Emily ReevesNewborn Screening Follow-Up Program, Florida Department of Health, Tallahassee, FL 32399, USA.
Kristin BarnetteNewborn Screening Follow-Up Program, Florida Department of Health, Tallahassee, FL 32399, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive genetic condition affecting nearly 1 in 4000 newborns. Early diagnosis and treatment have been shown to improve the care of individuals with CF, which is enhanced through newborn screening (NBS). The state of Florida has been performing CF NBS since 2007, and in 2022, Florida implemented enhanced next generation sequencing (NGS). The goal of this change was to identify individuals from under-represented racial and ethnic groups, who may have rare or de novo variants. NBS screening for CF involved a first tier with immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) ≥ 50 or the top 4% of daily specimens, whichever is lower, reflexing to a second tier. As of 2022, the second tier has evolved to an expanded sequence with an Agena 74-variant panel. Single variants would then reflex to the third tier utilizing NGS. NGS is able to confirm what is detected in second-tier testing, adding variants not included in the Agena panel, and refining the TG replications for Poly-T variants to determine pathogenicity of 5T results. When there is a variant of varying clinical consequence between the two databases, the most conservative classification is selected. Individuals with variants would then be referred to one of the contracted CF NBS referral centers for confirmatory sweat chloride testing (sweat). With implementation of NGS, referrals nearly tripled in 2022-2024, with 538 referrals in 2019; 485 in 2020; and 805 in 2021; followed by 1223 referrals made in 2022; 1146 in 2023; and 1294 in 2024. In 2022-2024, 71% of referrals to the contracted NBS CF referral centers were for single variant results, and no cases of CF were identified from these referrals. The number of CF cases remained about the same, ranging from 23 to 40 through the years 2019-2024. The number of CRMS/CFSPID cases, however, tripled going from 10 to 12 in 2019-2022 to over 100 in 2024. The reason for this change seems to be related to complex heterozygous genetic variants as opposed to abnormal sweat. Implementation of NGS for CF in Florida led to a significant increase in the identification of

Indexed as

cystic fibrosisimmunoreactive trypsinogennewborn screeningnext generation sequencequality improvementsweat test

Identifiers

PMID41133706
PMCPMC12551084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.