ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2025
Caregivers' Emotional Responses Triggered by a False-Positive VLCADD in Newborn Screening in Oita Prefecture.
Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neonatal screening programs for inborn errors of metabolism are essential for early diagnosis and intervention. However, false-positive results can cause unnecessary psychological stress for caregivers. This study investigated the emotional impact on a small number of caregivers in Oita Prefecture in Japan, whose infants received false-positive screening results for very long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (VLCADD). Particular attention was given to caregivers' concerns regarding episodes of transient fasting suggestive of nutritional deficiency, as well as their perspectives on appropriate feeding practices for newborns. Nineteen infants in Oita Prefecture were identified as having elevated acylcarnitines, which were later confirmed as false positives. Of these cases, 11 mothers consented to participate in a survey and long-term growth evaluation using health check records. Thirty children with normal screening results were included as controls. While no differences in physical growth were found between groups by 3.5 years of age, some mothers of false-positive infants reported persistent anxiety. Their concerns included regret for inadequate breastfeeding and latent adverse effects on long-term growth or development. Conversely, caregivers' anxiety diminished over time as they directly observed their infants' normal growth and development. No regret was expressed regarding breastfeeding, and concerns about VLDCAD were not observed. Caregivers' responses may help reduce their psychological burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.