Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41133641›Full record

ArticleNeuroSci2025

Frontal Regions and Executive Function Testing: A Doubted Association Shown by Brain-Injured Patients.

Demis Basso, Ida Bosio, Vincenza Tarantino, Francesco Carabba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroSci, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Demis BassoCognitive and Educational Sciences Lab (CESLab), Faculty of Education, Free University of Bolzano-Bozen, 39042 Bressanone-Brixen, BZ, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4595-3513
Ida BosioDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, 35131 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-3740-6200
Vincenza TarantinoDepartment of Psychology, Educational Sciences and Human Movement, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy.
Francesco CarabbaCognitive and Educational Sciences Lab (CESLab), Faculty of Education, Free University of Bolzano-Bozen, 39042 Bressanone-Brixen, BZ, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-7649-7367

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its introduction, the construct of executive functions (EFs) has been associated with a set of tests to assess these functions and a brain network centered in the associative frontal brain regions. While the majority of perspectives have endorsed these associations, some studies have started casting doubts on them. In this article, the association between the construct of EFs, the tests used to assess them, and the involvement of frontal regions is examined. A sample of 28 patients with brain injuries was divided into three subgroups according to the region of the injury (anterior, posterior, antero-posterior). Patients were assessed with a battery of tests, including 25 measures of EFs and 6 control measures. A series of regression models revealed no significant differences in performance across the three groups. Findings indicate that the EF tests are not specific enough to differentiate EFs and brain injuries. The alleged reference of EFs to the frontal areas of the brain should attribute a higher role to other associative areas. The present study provides recommendations about how the EFs concept could be improved through methodological refinements and/or its dissemination.

Indexed as

cortical areasexecutive functionsfrontal lobeneuropsychology

Identifiers

PMID41133641
PMCPMC12550954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.