ArticleProteomes2025
Proteomic Characterization of Primary Human Pancreatic Cancer Cell Lines Following Long-Term Exposure to Gemcitabine.
Article in Proteomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGemcitabine (GEM) remains a cornerstone in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Upon exposure to GEM, pancreatic cancer cells (PCCs) tend to adapt quickly to outcompete drug-induced cytotoxicity, thereby contributing to treatment failure. Thus, understanding GEM-induced molecular changes in PCCs is important.
methodsThree primary PCC lines (PCC-1, PCC-2, PCC-7) and Mia PaCa-2 cultured for 40 passages (p) in the absence (control) or presence of GEM (GemR) were assessed for phenotypic changes. Proteome profiles for all PCCs at p10, p20, p25, p30, p35, and p40 were obtained using mass spectrometry (MS). Protein expression was determined using immunoblotting. Differentially abundant proteins (DAPs) were evaluated for enrichment of functional and biological attributes and protein-protein interactions.
resultsGEM sensitivity and growth were both reduced in GemR versus paired controls for all four PCC lines. MS mapped > 7000 proteins in each PCC line, and the abundance of 70-83% of these was found to be significantly altered when comparing all sample groups. Proteomic changes in GemR versus paired controls differed remarkably among the PCCs and were affected by passaging and treatment duration. DAPs at p40 were mostly related to metabolic pathways, including nucleotide metabolism and diverse cell growth processes. Several closely related DAPs and multiple hub proteins in each PCC line were identified.
conclusionsOverall, this study revealed cell-line-specific, heterogeneous changes in proteome profiles of PCCs following their long-term exposure to GEM, and these were likely affected by treatment duration, dosage, and passaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.