ArticleVision (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Too Bright to Focus? Influence of Brightness Illusions and Ambient Light Levels on the Dynamics of Ocular Accommodation.
Article in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Can brightness illusions modulate ocular accommodation? Previous studies have shown that brightness illusions can influence pupil size as if caused by actual luminance increases. However, their effects on other ocular responses-such as accommodative or focusing dynamics-remain largely unexplored. This study investigates the influence of brightness illusions, under two ambient lighting conditions, on accommodative and pupillary dynamics (physiological responses), and on perceived brightness and visual comfort (subjective responses). Thirty-two young adults with healthy vision viewed four stimulus types (blue bright and non-bright, yellow bright and non-bright) under low- and high-contrast ambient lighting while ocular responses were recorded using a WAM-5500 open-field autorefractor. Brightness and comfort were rated after each session. The results showed that high ambient contrast (mesopic) and brightness illusions increased accommodative variability, while yellow stimuli elicited a greater lag under photopic condition. Pupil size decreased only under mesopic lighting. Perceived brightness was enhanced by brightness illusions and blue color, whereas visual comfort decreased for bright illusions, especially under low light. These findings suggest that ambient lighting and visual stimulus properties modulate both physiological and subjective responses, highlighting the need for dynamic accommodative assessment and visually ergonomic display design to reduce visual fatigue during digital device use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.