Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41133605›Full record

ArticleVision (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Too Bright to Focus? Influence of Brightness Illusions and Ambient Light Levels on the Dynamics of Ocular Accommodation.

Antonio Rodán, Angélica Fernández-López, Jesús Vera, Pedro R Montoro, Beatriz Redondo, Antonio Prieto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Antonio RodánGIFOA (Grupo de Investigación de Física y Óptica Aplicada), PEXCOG (Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience) Research Group, Departamento de Química y Bioquímica, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, 28668 Boadilla del Monte, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7674-3335
Angélica Fernández-LópezFarmacia López Cubas, Cubas de la Sagra, 28978 Madrid, Spain.
Jesús VeraCLARO (Clinical and Laboratory Applications of Research in Optometry) Research Group, Department of Optics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8091-2373
Pedro R MontoroPEXCOG (Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience) Research Group, Departamento de Psicología Básica I, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5665-8587
Beatriz RedondoCLARO (Clinical and Laboratory Applications of Research in Optometry) Research Group, Department of Optics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4571-873X
Antonio PrietoPEXCOG (Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience) Research Group, Departamento de Psicología Básica I, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3394-5962

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Can brightness illusions modulate ocular accommodation? Previous studies have shown that brightness illusions can influence pupil size as if caused by actual luminance increases. However, their effects on other ocular responses-such as accommodative or focusing dynamics-remain largely unexplored. This study investigates the influence of brightness illusions, under two ambient lighting conditions, on accommodative and pupillary dynamics (physiological responses), and on perceived brightness and visual comfort (subjective responses). Thirty-two young adults with healthy vision viewed four stimulus types (blue bright and non-bright, yellow bright and non-bright) under low- and high-contrast ambient lighting while ocular responses were recorded using a WAM-5500 open-field autorefractor. Brightness and comfort were rated after each session. The results showed that high ambient contrast (mesopic) and brightness illusions increased accommodative variability, while yellow stimuli elicited a greater lag under photopic condition. Pupil size decreased only under mesopic lighting. Perceived brightness was enhanced by brightness illusions and blue color, whereas visual comfort decreased for bright illusions, especially under low light. These findings suggest that ambient lighting and visual stimulus properties modulate both physiological and subjective responses, highlighting the need for dynamic accommodative assessment and visually ergonomic display design to reduce visual fatigue during digital device use.

Indexed as

accommodationbrightness illusionchromatic stimulidigital screen ergonomicsluminance contrastmesopic lightingperceived brightnesspupil sizevisual comfortvisual fatigue

Identifiers

PMID41133605
PMCPMC12551090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.