Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41133520›Full record

ArticleClinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery2026

Post-COVID-19 Pandemic Growth of National Hearing Aid Utilisation: A Population-Based Study.

Keren Oren, Itai Hazan, Stave Edri Abikasis, Tomer Kerman, Liron Kariv, Oded Cohen, Oren Ziv

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Post-COVID-19 Pandemic Growth of National Hearing Aid Utilisation: A Population-Based Study.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Keren OrenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ashdod, Israel.
Itai HazanJoyce and Irving Goldman Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Stave Edri AbikasisJoyce and Irving Goldman Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Tomer KermanJoyce and Irving Goldman Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Liron KarivDepartment of Communication Disorders, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
Oded CohenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ashdod, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-8666-3571
Oren ZivJoyce and Irving Goldman Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-3286-9248

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHearing loss affects 538 million people globally. Untreated hearing loss may be compensated through speech reading. The COVID-19 pandemic prompted face coverings, causing communication challenges. We aim to investigate the possible impact of the COVID-19 outbreak era on hearing aid demand. STUDY

designEcological time-series study. SETTINGS: A health organisation with five million members.

methodsWe examined the number of patients referred for hearing aid fitting by an otolaryngologist from March 2018 to February 2024. The data were stratified into three main groups: pre-pandemic (control group, 2018-2020), COVID-19 pandemic (study group 1, 2020-2022) and post-pandemic group (study group 2, 2022-2024).

resultsA total of 97 149 patients were included in the study. The yearly incidence rate of referrals for hearing aid fitting (per 100 000 patients) in all age groups increased in all study groups (during and post-COVID) compared to the average incidence of the control group, with a notable increase in the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic onward. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) for the 18-49 age group showed the largest and most significant increase 3.16 (95% CI: 2.74, 3.65) in the second post-COVID year compared to the pre-COVID period (p < 0.001). Significant increases were also observed in the 50-75 age group IRR: 2.10 (95% CI: 1.87, 2.36) and the 75-120 age group IRR: 1.53 (95% CI: 1.35, 1.74) (p < 0.001).

conclusionThere is a significant increase in the demand for hearing aids following the COVID-19 outbreak. Considering the possibility of future outbreaks and the everyday increase in face masking usage, health providers and patients should be further encouraged to pursue hearing rehabilitation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Indexed as

COVID-19Hearing AidsHearing LossAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Young Adultbig dataCOVID‐19face coveringhearing aidshearing loss

Identifiers

PMID41133520
PMCPMC12869008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.