Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41133513›Full record

ReviewMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Prospects of AI-Powered Bowel Sound Analytics for Diagnosis, Characterization, and Treatment Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Divyanshi Sood, Zenab Muhammad Riaz, Jahnavi Mikkilineni, Narendra Nath Ravi, Vineeta Chidipothu, Gayathri Yerrapragada, Poonguzhali Elangovan, Mohammed Naveed Shariff, Thangeswaran Natarajan, Jayarajasekaran Janarthanan and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Extraction of Acoustic Features via Empirical Wavelet Transform to Determine Stenosis Degree of the Left Anterior Descending Artery Based on the Diastolic Heart Sounds of 75 Participants.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Divyanshi SoodDepartment of Internal Medicine, UCHealth Parkview Medical Center, Pueblo, CO 81004, USA.
Zenab Muhammad RiazDepartment of Internal Medicine, Northwell Vassar Brothers Medical Center, Poughkeepsie, NY 12601, USA.
Jahnavi MikkilineniDivision of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Narendra Nath RaviDepartment of Family Medicine, Altru Health System, Grand Forks, ND 58201, USA.
Vineeta ChidipothuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University-Henry Ford Rochester Hospital, Rochester Hills, MI 48307, USA.
Gayathri YerrapragadaDigital Engineering & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (DEAL), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Poonguzhali ElangovanDigital Engineering & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (DEAL), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Mohammed Naveed ShariffDigital Engineering & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (DEAL), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-2430-7370
Thangeswaran NatarajanDigital Engineering & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (DEAL), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-6640-7942
Jayarajasekaran JanarthananDigital Engineering & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (DEAL), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Naghmeh AsadimaneshDigital Engineering & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (DEAL), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Shiva Sankari KaruppiahDigital Engineering & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (DEAL), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Keerthy GopalakrishnanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wright Medical Center, Scranton, PA 18510, USA.
Shivaram P ArunachalamDigital Engineering & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (DEAL), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3251-5415

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis narrative review examines the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in bowel sound analysis for the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, presents a significant clinical burden due to its unpredictable course, variable symptomatology, and reliance on invasive procedures for diagnosis and disease monitoring. Despite advances in imaging and biomarkers, tools such as colonoscopy and fecal calprotectin remain costly, uncomfortable, and impractical for frequent or real-time assessment. Meanwhile, bowel sounds-an overlooked physiologic signal-reflect underlying gastrointestinal motility and inflammation but have historically lacked objective quantification. With recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and acoustic signal processing, there is growing interest in leveraging bowel sound analysis as a novel, non-invasive biomarker for detecting IBD, monitoring disease activity, and predicting disease flares. This approach holds the promise of continuous, low-cost, and patient-friendly monitoring, which could transform IBD management.

objectivesThis narrative review assesses the clinical utility, methodological rigor, and potential future integration of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven bowel sound analysis in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with a focus on its potential as a non-invasive biomarker for disease activity, flare prediction, and differential diagnosis.

methodsThis manuscript reviews the potential of AI-powered bowel sound analysis as a non-invasive tool for diagnosing, monitoring, and managing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Traditional diagnostic methods, such as colonoscopy and biomarkers, are often invasive, costly, and impractical for real-time monitoring. The manuscript explores bowel sounds, which reflect gastrointestinal motility and inflammation, as an alternative biomarker by utilizing AI techniques like convolutional neural networks (CNNs), transformers, and gradient boosting. We analyze data on acoustic signal acquisition (e.g., smart T-shirts, smartphones), signal processing methodologies (e.g., MFCCs, spectrograms, empirical mode decomposition), and validation metrics (e.g., accuracy, F1 scores, AUC). Studies were assessed for clinical relevance, methodological rigor, and translational potential.

resultsAcross studies enrolling 16-100 participants, AI models achieved diagnostic accuracies of 88-96%, with AUCs ≥ 0.83 and F1 scores ranging from 0.71 to 0.85 for differentiating IBD from healthy controls and IBS. Transformer-based approaches (e.g., HuBERT, Wav2Vec 2.0) consistently outperformed CNNs and tabular models, yielding F1 scores of 80-85%, while gradient boosting on wearable multi-microphone recordings demonstrated robustness to background noise. Distinct acoustic signatures were identified, including prolonged sound-to-sound intervals in Crohn's disease (mean 1232 ms vs. 511 ms in IBS) and high-pitched tinkling in stricturing phenotypes. Despite promising performance, current models remain below established biomarkers such as fecal calprotectin (~90% sensitivity for active disease), and generalizability is limited by small, heterogeneous cohorts and the absence of prospective validation.

conclusionsAI-powered bowel sound analysis represents a promising, non-invasive tool for IBD monitoring. However, widespread clinical integration requires standardized data acquisition protocols, large multi-center datasets with clinical correlates, explainable AI frameworks, and ethical data governance. Future directions include wearable-enabled remote monitoring platforms and multi-modal decision support systems integrating bowel sounds with biomarker and symptom data. This manuscript emphasizes the need for large-scale, multi-center studies, the development of explainable AI frameworks, and the integration of these tools within clinical workflows. Future directions include remote monitoring using wearables and multi-modal systems that combine bowel sounds with biomarkers and patient symptoms, aiming to transform IBD care into a more personalized and proactive model.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceInflammatory Bowel DiseasesBiomarkersCrohn DiseaseHumansBiomarkersacoustic signal processingartificial intelligencebowel soundsdeep learninggastrointestinal acousticsIBD monitoringinflammatory bowel diseasenon-invasive biomarker

Identifiers

PMID41133513
PMCPMC12551071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.