ReviewMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Right Heart Failure in Critical and Chronic Care: Current Concepts, Challenges and Mechanical Support Strategies.
Review in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemotherapy-Induced Right Ventricular Dysfunction.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Vasoplegia in Cardiac Surgery and Mechanical Circulatory Support: From Cardiopulmonary Bypass to Advanced Circulatory Support Devices.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- The Right Ventricle in Cardiac Critical Care: Pathophysiology, Evaluation and Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Echocardiographic Assessment of Right Ventricular-Pulmonary Arterial Coupling in Heart Failure: Prognostic Insights from a Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Right heart failure (RHF) remains an under-recognized yet devastating condition in critically ill and chronic patients, frequently complicating cardiac surgery, pulmonary embolism, advanced heart failure, sepsis and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Despite growing awareness, clinical decision making is still hampered by the complex pathophysiology, limitations in diagnosis and a fragmented therapeutic landscape. In recent years, progress in hemodynamic phenotyping, advanced echocardiographic and biomarker-based assessment, and the development of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) systems, including percutaneous and surgical right ventricle assist devices (RVAD), veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO), Impella RP (right percutaneous) or BiPella (Impella CP/5.0/5.5 + Impella RP) has expanded the armamentarium for managing RHF. This review synthetizes current evidences on the anatomical, physiological and molecular underpinnings of RHF, delineates the distinction and continuum between acute and chronic forms and provides a comparative analysis of diagnostic tools and MCS strategies. By integrating mechanistic insights with emerging clinical frameworks, the review aims to support earlier recognition, tailored management and innovative therapeutic approaches for this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.