ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2025
Comparative Analysis of Microbial Load in Smoked and Fried Tilapia (Chambo) From Wholesale and Retail Markets.
Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fish, including Oreochromis shiranus (Chambo), is a vital protein source in Malawi, but consumption has declined. Due to its perishability, preservation methods like smoking and frying are common. This study compares the microbial load in smoked and fried tilapia from wholesale and retail markets. This cross-sectional study compared the microbial load in smoked and fried tilapia (Chambo) from wholesale (Salima) and retail (Lilongwe) markets. Twenty fish samples (10 smoked and 10 fried) were collected, transported in sterile conditions, and analyzed for Total Aerobic Plate Count and coliforms using ISO-standard methods. Data was log-transformed and analyzed using two-way analysis of variance, with significance set at p < 0.05. Fried tilapia from wholesalers had low levels of contamination, with most samples showing too few colonies to count, while some smoked samples displayed higher bacterial counts (33.75 ± 3.77 CFU/mL). Retailer samples showed a wider range of bacterial species, including Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas putida, suggesting potential hygiene concerns. Overall, bacterial loads were significantly higher in tilapia from retail markets compared with those from wholesalers (p < 0.05). The analysis showed higher microbial contamination in tilapia from retailers, with greater bacterial diversity, including E. coli, indicating poor hygiene. Wholesaler samples had minimal contamination. Although preservation methods showed no significant difference in microbial loads, retailer fish had significantly higher bacterial loads.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.