ArticleBMJ public health2025
Exploring healthcare priorities, barriers, access and experiences of a family-centred approach among families seeking asylum in North London.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Children and families seeking asylum have significant unmet health needs. The Respond service was established in response to high numbers of families seeking asylum arriving in Camden (London, UK) in August 2021 and delivers hospital and community-based holistic assessment and infectious disease screening for this population. Families are seen in a joint appointment by a multidisciplinary team of adult and paediatric health professionals. We explored the priorities, barriers and experiences around healthcare access among families using the service and the acceptability and perceived effectiveness of a family-centred approach from the perspective of service users, service providers and key stakeholders. Methods: We employed qualitative and quantitative approaches. Questionnaires and semistructured interviews were completed between July and September 2022. Questionnaires were built on Google Forms and Envoy Messenger (Healthcare Communications). Thematic analysis was performed and structured by key themes. Data were analysed with the assistance of NVivo. Results: Access to dental care, primary care and immunisations were identified as key priorities for families. Significant barriers of access to care included understanding (language), situation (temporary accommodation) and awareness (unfamiliarity with systems, digital poverty, signposting). The Respond family-centred model was positively received by service users, service providers and stakeholders. Benefits included the provision of holistic family-centred care and support, efficiency and value-for-money for the health service. Areas needing ongoing input were language barriers, educational support for staff and service users and continued collaboration and co-creation between service providers and service users. Conclusion: Recognising the priorities and barriers identified in this study is crucial for enhancing access to and utilisation of services within this underserved community. The Respond family-centred model was well received and perceived as effective by service users, providers and stakeholders. It serves as a foundational framework for developing tailored services for children and families seeking asylum across the UK and internationally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.