ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2025
A Dual-Modality Ultrasound Video Recognition Model for Distinguishing Subpleural Pulmonary Nodules.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Do Multimodal Vision-Language Models Enhance the Medical Diagnostic Process? A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop a deep learning model based on dual-modality ultrasound (DMUS) video recognition for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant subpleural pulmonary nodules (SPNs). Patients and Methods: Participant data (n=193, median age, 58 years [IQR, 34-66 years]; 123 men) with SPNs, prospectively collected from January 7, to December 21, 2020, were divided into training (n=154) and validation (n=39) sets in an 8:2 ratio. Additionally, independent internal (n=88) and external (n=91) test sets were prospectively collected from January 10 to June 25, 2021. The nature of the SPNs was determined through biopsy (n=306) and clinical follow-up (n=66). Our model integrated DMUS videos, time-intensity curves, and clinical information. The model's performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity and compared with state-of-the-art video classification models, as well as ultrasound and computed tomography diagnoses made by radiologists. Results: In the internal test set, our model accurately distinguished malignant from benign SPNs with an AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.91, 91% (80 of 88), 90% (27 of 30), and 91% (53 of 58), outperforming state-of-the-art video classification models (all Conclusion: This deep learning model based on DMUS video recognition enhances the performance of ultrasound in differentiating benign from malignant SPNs. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: ChiCTR1800019828.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.