ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2025
An Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiogram to Evaluate Patients With Dyspnea in the Emergency Department.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate whether an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) for diastolic function/filling pressure can determine whether dyspnea in emergency department (ED) patients is cardiac in origin. Patients and Methods: We identified 2412 patients aged 18 years or older presented with dyspnea/shortness of breath to the ED who had an ECG performed at the time of evaluation from January 2020 to December 2022. The AI-ECG for determining left ventricular diastolic function to identify the patients with cardiac cause of dyspnea was assessed, using the final diagnosis based on subsequent evaluation. Results: Of the 2412 patients, 966 (40%) were found to have cardiac dyspnea, and the remaining 1446 (60%) were noncardiac. The AI-ECG-estimated diastolic function was divided into 4 groups: 922 (38.2%) were normal, 245 (10.2%) grade 1, 1192 (49.4%) grade 2, and 53 (2.2%) grade 3. The probability of cardiac dyspnea was considerably higher in patients with grade 2 (62.2%±48.5%) and 3 (83%±37.9%) diastolic function compared with normal (14.1%±34.8%) and grade 1 (20.8%±40.7%). The incidence of cardiac dyspnea increased as the probability of increasing filling pressure increased on AI-ECG. Conclusion: Patients often present to the ED with undifferentiated dyspnea. It is important to promptly determine whether the symptoms have cardiac origin. Cardiac dyspnea often reflects elevated left ventricular filling pressures. Artificial intelligence-enhanced 12-lead electrocardiograms can precisely assess diastolic function and filling pressures. Among patients who presented to the ED with dyspnea/shortness of breath, AI-ECG assessing diastolic function strongly distinguished whether the cause was cardiac.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.