Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41133124›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2025

The science of minerality.

Hui-Chung Tai, Evmorfia Kostaki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hui-Chung TaiTipple Scientist, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica Taipei 115 Taiwan drtai@tipplescientist.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6826-7380
Evmorfia KostakiKostaki Winery Epameinonda Stamatiadi 4 Samos Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9097-8277

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minerality in wine has been a subject of intense debate. The current perception of minerality in wine is mainly based on geological viewpoints and sensory studies, and the scientific understanding remains limited. We review interdisciplinary studies and integrate their key findings with physicochemical guidelines to unravel the fundamental principles of minerality. Minerality arises from the combinatorial activity of various sensory receptors stimulated by versatile minerals, promoting complexity and uniqueness. This comprehensive review will revolutionize how mineral sensation is perceived and will allow the creation of convincing marketing strategies. A great impact on the research of terroir, winemaking, and molecular mechanisms of mineral sensing is foreseen.

Identifiers

PMID41133124
PMCPMC12542900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.