ArticleCureus2025
Angiography-Guided Limb Salvage Planning in a Surgical Candidate With Gas Gangrene of the Foot.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gas gangrene is a fulminant soft-tissue infection that requires rapid intervention to prevent extensive tissue destruction and mortality. Diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy often have delayed recognition of injuries and impaired wound healing, placing them at substantially higher risk of severe complications. This report presents a 60-year-old male patient with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy who developed gas gangrene of the right foot. Despite two initial debridements, concern remained for progressive infection necessitating limb amputation. An abdominal aortogram with run-off demonstrated preserved distal perfusion of the right lower extremity, allowing the surgical team to consider below-the-knee amputation (BKA) rather than above-the-knee amputation (AKA). BKA allows for improved prosthetic fitting and lower energy expenditure during ambulation, which is preferable to the outcomes typically seen with AKA. Ultimately, the patient chose to defer amputation and arranged for outpatient follow-up to revisit the decision at a later time. This case underscores the role of angiography in guiding amputation planning and highlights the need to balance clinical judgment with patient autonomy in limb salvage decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.