Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41133074›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Evolving Clinical Management of Postoperative Delirium: A Narrative Review.

Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Drake P Duplechin, Andrew T Haynes, Alex V Hollander, Ross Rieger, Carlo Jean Baptiste, Giustino Varrassi, Sahar Shekoohi, Alan D Kaye

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shahab AhmadzadehDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA.
Drake P DuplechinSchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA.
Andrew T HaynesSchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA.
Alex V HollanderSchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA.
Ross RiegerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA.
Carlo Jean BaptisteDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA.
Giustino VarrassiPain Medicine, Fondazione Paolo Procacci, Rome, ITA.
Sahar ShekoohiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA.
Alan D KayeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative delirium (POD) is the most common neurologic complication after surgery, affecting 15-50% of adults ≥65 years and up to 80% of those admitted to intensive care units. Clinically, POD is characterized by an acute, fluctuating disturbance in attention, awareness, and cognition that typically arises within 72 hours of anesthesia. Its occurrence is associated with a threefold rise in 30-day mortality, prolonged mechanical ventilation, increased institutionalization, and long-term cognitive decline, underscoring its substantial human and financial burden. POD arises through a multifactorial pathogenesis that includes neuroinflammation, blood-brain‑barrier disruption, neurotransmitter imbalance, sleep fragmentation, and perioperative cerebral hypoperfusion. Patient-related risk factors (advanced age, pre-existing cognitive impairment, frailty, sensory deficits, alcohol misuse, and polypharmacy) intersect with surgical drivers such as operative duration, intraoperative hypotension, high opioid doses, benzodiazepine exposure, and postoperative infections. Prevention hinges on identifying at-risk patients and mitigating modifiable factors. High-quality evidence supports the use of multicomponent nonpharmacological bundles, including orientation protocols, early mobilization, sleep promotion, optimized pain control, and hearing and vision aids, which reduce delirium incidence by 30-40%. Among pharmacologic strategies, dexmedetomidine infusion during and after cardiac and major noncardiac surgery consistently lowers delirium rates, whereas routine prophylaxis with antipsychotics, melatonin agonists, or cholinesterase inhibitors remains unproven and is not currently recommended outside clinical trials. Management prioritizes rapid diagnosis using validated tools (e.g., confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM‑ICU)), correction of precipitating insults, and judicious symptom control with low-dose haloperidol or atypical antipsychotics when nonpharmacologic measures fail. Future research should clarify optimal hemodynamic targets, refine electroencephalogram (EEG)-guided anesthetic titration, evaluate peri‑operative neuro‑inflammation biomarkers, and develop personalized, risk-stratified prevention algorithms further to reduce POD's pervasive impact on older surgical patients.

Indexed as

anesthesiadeliriumelderlyicumultimodal managementpolypharmacypostoperative cognitive dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID41133074
PMCPMC12542918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.