Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41133060›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Late-Presenting Congenital Subaortic Membrane With Aortic Regurgitation Presenting as Dyspnoea: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Ahmed Abouelazm, Kirollos Philops

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ahmed AbouelazmCardiology, Portsmouth University Hospital, Portsmouth, GBR.
Kirollos PhilopsCardiology, Portsmouth University Hospital, Portsmouth, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subaortic membrane (SAM) is a rare congenital cause of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction. While often diagnosed in childhood, it can remain clinically silent until adolescence or adulthood, presenting diagnostic and management challenges due to its indolent progression and lack of adult-specific guidelines. SAM is frequently associated with progressive aortic valve pathology, including aortic regurgitation (AR). We report the case of an 18-year-old male with a previously unrecognised congenital subaortic membrane presenting with exertional dyspnoea and dizziness. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed a discrete 0.5 cm subaortic membrane, a peak left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient of 45 mmHg, and mild-to-moderate central AR. Cardiac computed tomography (CT) confirmed the lesion with no coronary anomalies. The patient underwent successful surgical resection of the membrane, resulting in a reduced post-operative LVOT gradient (peak 1.68 m/s, mean gradient (MG) 6 mmHg) and resolution of symptoms. Follow-up echocardiography at three months confirmed persistence of only mild AR with no residual LVOT gradient, and the patient reported full return to premorbid functional status (New York Heart Association (NYHA) I), highlighting favourable short-term outcomes. This case highlights the importance of recognising late-presenting congenital SAM in symptomatic adolescents and young adults. Early diagnosis, appropriate imaging, and timely surgical intervention are essential. The case underscores the need for standardised long-term surveillance and the development of adult-specific management strategies, especially considering the high risk of recurrence after surgery.

Indexed as

aortic regurgitationcardiac computed tomographyechocardiographyleft ventricular outflow tract obstructionsubaortic membrane

Identifiers

PMID41133060
PMCPMC12543041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.