Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41133047›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Efficacy of Gut Microbiome-Targeted Therapies in Modulating Systemic Inflammation and Low-Grade Chronic Inflammatory States in Adults With Metabolic Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Abdulkreem Al-Juhani, Mahmoud S Desoky, Amaal A Almuhaimid, Memona Zaheer, Hoor F Alhaqbani, Elaf A Abalkhail, Sama A Alanazi, Ruof S Alzahrani, Mamoun Alrefaai, Rodan Desoky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abdulkreem Al-JuhaniForensic Medicine Department, Forensic Medicine Center, Jeddah, SAU.
Mahmoud S DesokyInternal Medicine, Gastroenterology, Sultan Bin Abdulaziz Humanitarian City, Riyadh, SAU.
Amaal A AlmuhaimidCollege of Medicine, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, SAU.
Memona ZaheerMedicine, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, SAU.
Hoor F AlhaqbaniCollege of Medicine, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, SAU.
Elaf A AbalkhailMedicine and Surgery, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, SAU.
Sama A AlanaziMedical School, AlMaarefa University, Riyadh, SAU.
Ruof S AlzahraniMedical School, AlMaarefa University, Riyadh, SAU.
Mamoun AlrefaaiCollege of Medicine, Internal Medicine, AlMaarefa University, Riyadh, SAU.
Rodan DesokyMedicine, Alfaisal University College of Medicine, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiome-targeted therapies have shown promise in promoting the outcomes of metabolic inflammation-related disease management. This review aims to assess the effectiveness of microbiome-targeted interventions and pinpoint the most promising therapies for clinical implementation. Following the PRISMA 2020 standards, we searched four main databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. We integrated medical subject headings (MeSH) and free-text keywords search pertinent to gut microbiome-targeted interventions, along with related outcomes such as inflammation and insulin resistance. English studies were conducted on primary adults with a metabolic disease diagnosis or deemed a high risk, and were mandated to report at least one outcome pertinent to metabolic health or systemic inflammation. To assess the risk bias, data were extracted, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) 2.0 tool was employed. Fifteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A narrative synthesis was conducted. We found that probiotics significantly enhanced insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), reduced circulating endotoxin levels, decreased visceral fat, BMI, and fat mass, and increased beneficial taxa with obesity-associated bacteria reduction. However, inconsistent outcomes were shown for lipid parameters. Prebiotic therapies showed significant decreases in fasting glucose in overweight people, and insulin levels and HOMA-IR in patients with metabolic syndrome, enhanced anti-inflammatory effects (31% C-reactive protein (CRP) reduction, decreased interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF)-α, and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) levels), and promoted butyrate-producing bacteria. Synbiotic interventions showed complementary benefits for glucose metabolism and body composition. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) studies indicated improved insulin sensitivity and donor microbiota engraftment in responders. Fiber-rich diet trials markedly improved HbA1c levels in diabetic and prediabetic individuals. In conclusion, prebiotics demonstrated the most consistent metabolic and anti-inflammatory benefits across multiple parameters. Probiotics showed targeted effects on insulin resistance and body composition but inconsistent lipid outcomes. FMT and synbiotics require further investigation to establish clinical efficacy. This evidence supports prebiotics as a priority intervention for metabolic disease management through microbiome modulation.

Indexed as

fecal microbiota transplantation (fmt)gut microbiomeinflammatory markerslow-grade chronic inflammationmetabolic syndromeobesityprebioticsprobioticssynbioticstype 2

Identifiers

PMID41133047
PMCPMC12541121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.