ArticleCureus2025
A Prospective Observational Quality Improvement Study of a Two-Step Ultrasound Protocol for Guidewire Confirmation During the Internal Jugular Central Venous Catheter Placement.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anatomical patterns and clinical outcomes of central venous catheter malpositions: A systematic review of published case reports and case series.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Point-of-care ultrasonography for verification of central venous catheter placement in cats and dogs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Malposition of central venous catheters (CVCs) remains a relevant complication despite the use of ultrasound guidance. Traditional radiographic confirmation increases cost and radiation exposure. A minimal ultrasound protocol for guidewire confirmation may help reduce malposition rates without postprocedural radiographic imaging. Objectives To assess the effectiveness of a standardized two-step ultrasound protocol for confirming guidewire placement during internal jugular vein (IJV) CVC insertion in reducing catheter malposition rates. Methods This was a prospective observational quality improvement project conducted over six months in the anesthesia department of a tertiary hospital. Adult patients undergoing elective IJV CVC placement were included. A standardized two-step ultrasound protocol for guidewire confirmation during IJV CVC placement was introduced: (1) confirmation of caudal guidewire progression in the IJV and (2) exclusion of guidewire presence in the ipsilateral subclavian vein. Protocol adherence was evaluated prospectively by obtaining images and/or videos documenting the two-step ultrasound verification process. These recordings were captured by either the resident or the attending physician during the placement of the guidewire. All collected media were subsequently reviewed to confirm compliance with each step of the protocol. Catheter tip location was assessed routinely via postprocedural chest X-rays. The primary outcome was CVC malposition. Statistical analysis included Fisher's exact test and descriptive statistics. Results Out of 524 procedures, 506 were analyzed, while 18 were excluded due to a lack of postprocedural chest X-rays. Complete protocol adherence occurred in 243 (48%) cases. No malpositions occurred in the protocol-adherent group (0/243; 0%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0-1.2%), whereas seven malpositions occurred among 263 partially adherent and non-adherent cases (2.7%). Fisher's exact test showed a significant association between non-adherence and malposition (p = 0.015). One contralateral pneumothorax unrelated to CVC insertion was observed. Conclusion A simple two-step ultrasound protocol for guidewire confirmation was associated with a significantly lower rate of CVC malposition. The method is feasible, efficient, and may serve as an alternative to routine radiographic confirmation in appropriate clinical contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.