ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025
Imaging biomarkers related to tumor-associated macrophage in immunotherapy treatment planning for non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recent studies have highlighted the critical role of lymph nodes in the anti-tumor immune response. To identify noninvasive biomarkers for selecting optimal candidates for immunotherapy, we hypothesized that quantitative information extracted from lymph nodes via computed tomography (CT) radiomics analysis could provide supplementary predictive value. We further investigated the relationship between the radiomics model and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) to elucidate the biological basis of the model. Methods: We analyzed 1,070 primary and lymph node lesions from 212 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) therapy. Pre-treatment contrast-enhanced CT images were divided into training, test, and external test cohorts to derive radiomic signatures from the whole tumor, peritumoral regions, and lymph nodes. These signatures were then evaluated for their association with durable clinical benefit (DCB), objective response, pseudoprogression, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Finally, the biological relevance of the radiomic signatures was assessed using immunohistochemical data and multivariate linear regression. Results: The established radiomic signature achieved sensitivities of 84.48%, 85%, and 92.31% in identifying patients with DCB across the three cohorts, with nearly consistent specificities. It accurately identified 28.57% of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-negative patients who derived clinical benefit from immunotherapy. Additionally, the signature distinguished partial/complete response (PR/CR) with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.67, 0.72, and 0.71 across the cohorts. It also predicted PFS (C-indices: 0.68, 0.66, and 0.64) and OS (C-indices: 0.61, 0.65, and 0.62), respectively. Furthermore, the signature demonstrated an AUC of 0.80 in differentiating pseudoprogression from hyperprogression, aiding treatment decision-making. Notably, it was independently associated with M2-like TAMs (P=0.002). Conclusions: By integrating lymph node-related quantitative information, we developed a radiomics signature linked to treatment response and clinical outcomes. This signature not only enhances the identification of optimal immunotherapy candidates with higher sensitivity prior to treatment initiation but also supports treatment strategy adjustments following therapy onset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.