ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025
Integrating deep learning and radiomics in the differentiation of major histological subtypes of invasive non-mucinous lung adenocarcinoma using positron emission tomography and computed tomography.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lightweight hybrid foundation model for lung cancer prognosis based on low-dose chest X-ray images.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- AI-assisted clinico-quantitative imaging nomogram for preoperative malignancy risk in solid and part-solid pulmonary nodules ≤ 3 cm: development and internal validation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate identification of the main subtypes of invasive non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (INMA) is essential for individualized treatment. Given the limitations of preoperative biopsy pathological diagnosis, this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) radiomics features, deep learning (DL) features, and their combined models for non-invasive identification of the four main INMA subtypes prior to surgery. Methods: A total of 386 patients from hospital one and 32 patients from hospital two with preoperative PET/CT images were enrolled as the training, internal validation cohorts and external validation cohorts, retrospectively. Radiomics features were extracted from CT, PET and PET/CT images to build radiomics models using various machine learning (ML) classifiers. DL features were extracted using a Resnet34 trained to extract DL features from the best performance model. Different fusion techniques were utilized to identify subtypes. Different fusion techniques were employed to integrate the radiomic and DL features to build a final fusion model for subtype differentiation. Results: The radiomics model using support vector machine (SVM) classifier achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79, accuracy of 0.70, and precision of 0.70 for differentiating the four INMA subtypes. The DL model demonstrated the best performance in the internal validation cohort with an AUC and accuracy of 0.89 and 0.74, respectively. The combined mode integrating radiomic and DL features from fused PET/CT images achieved the highest performance in the external validation cohort with an AUC, accuracy and precision of 0.85, 0.81, and 0.85, respectively. Conclusions: Integrating DL and radiomic features derived from PET/CT images is a feasible and accurate approach for differentiating the four main subtypes of INMA preoperatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.