Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41132949›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025

An effective and affordable blood test for lung cancer early detection using four protein markers and artificial intelligence.

Bing Wei, Wenjian Wang, Shuaipeng Geng, Wei Wu, Chenyu Ding, Dandan Zhu, Shuoyao Cheng, Qiurong Zhao, Yi Luan, Shiyong Li and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bing Wei *Department of Molecular Pathology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Wenjian Wang *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Shuaipeng Geng *Clinical Laboratories, Shenyou Bio, Zhengzhou, China.
Wei Wu *Research & Development, SeekIn Inc., Shenzhen, China.
Chenyu DingClinical Laboratories, Shenyou Bio, Zhengzhou, China.
Dandan ZhuClinical Laboratories, Shenyou Bio, Zhengzhou, China.
Shuoyao ChengClinical Laboratories, Shenyou Bio, Zhengzhou, China.
Qiurong ZhaoClinical Laboratories, Shenyou Bio, Zhengzhou, China.
Yi LuanClinical Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Shiyong LiResearch & Development, SeekIn Inc., Shenzhen, China.
Mao MaoResearch & Development, SeekIn Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8570-8571

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer constitutes the leading cause of cancer mortality globally. This study assessed LungCanSeek, a novel blood-based protein test for lung cancer early detection. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 1,814 participants (1,095 lung cancer, 719 non-cancer) from three different cohorts. Blood samples were analyzed for four protein tumor markers (PTMs) using Roche cobas. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms were developed for lung cancer detection and subtype classification: lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). A two-step approach was modeled, using LungCanSeek for initial screening, followed by low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for LungCanSeek's positive cases. Results: LungCanSeek achieved 83.5% sensitivity, 90.3% specificity, and 86.2% accuracy overall. Sensitivities of LUAD, LUSC, and SCLC were 83.3%, 81.4%, and 91.9%. Sensitivity increased with clinical stage in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): 59.5% (I), 69.8% (II), 86.5% (III), and 91.3% (IV). Sensitivities of limited-stage and extensive-stage SCLC were 91.3% and 93.0%, respectively. The subtype classification accuracy was 77.4%. Simulation model analysis showed that the two-step approach reduced 10.3-fold false positives and 2.5-fold cost compared to LDCT for lung cancer screening in high-risk population. Conclusions: LungCanSeek is a non-invasive and cost-effective test for lung cancer early detection. The two-step approach offers a cost-effective strategy for population-wide lung cancer screening.

Indexed as

lung cancer early detectionLungCanSeekProtein tumor markers (PTMs)subtype classificationtwo-step approach

Identifiers

PMID41132949
PMCPMC12541848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.