ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025
An effective and affordable blood test for lung cancer early detection using four protein markers and artificial intelligence.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Lung Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Advances in translational lung cancer research in 2025: a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- Revolutionizing lung cancer screening: the rise of artificial intelligence integrating circulating tumor markers.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence construction: a review of the bridge between CT imaging features of lung ground-glass nodules adenocarcinoma and carcinogenic driver genes.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer constitutes the leading cause of cancer mortality globally. This study assessed LungCanSeek, a novel blood-based protein test for lung cancer early detection. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 1,814 participants (1,095 lung cancer, 719 non-cancer) from three different cohorts. Blood samples were analyzed for four protein tumor markers (PTMs) using Roche cobas. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms were developed for lung cancer detection and subtype classification: lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). A two-step approach was modeled, using LungCanSeek for initial screening, followed by low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for LungCanSeek's positive cases. Results: LungCanSeek achieved 83.5% sensitivity, 90.3% specificity, and 86.2% accuracy overall. Sensitivities of LUAD, LUSC, and SCLC were 83.3%, 81.4%, and 91.9%. Sensitivity increased with clinical stage in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): 59.5% (I), 69.8% (II), 86.5% (III), and 91.3% (IV). Sensitivities of limited-stage and extensive-stage SCLC were 91.3% and 93.0%, respectively. The subtype classification accuracy was 77.4%. Simulation model analysis showed that the two-step approach reduced 10.3-fold false positives and 2.5-fold cost compared to LDCT for lung cancer screening in high-risk population. Conclusions: LungCanSeek is a non-invasive and cost-effective test for lung cancer early detection. The two-step approach offers a cost-effective strategy for population-wide lung cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.