ArticleTelemedicine reports2025
Reliability and Accuracy of Inpatient Teledermatology in Asian Patients.
Article in Telemedicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies demonstrated the reliability and accuracy of teledermatology in outpatient settings. It is cost effective and can enhance accessibility to specialist care, leading to better patient outcomes. Few studies have investigated inpatient teledermatology, and local data are lacking. This study aimed to determine whether store-and-forward teledermatology is accurate and reliable for inpatient dermatology consultations in Asians. Methods: During the study period from April to June 2022, consecutive inpatient dermatology consultations were collected at a tertiary referral center in Hong Kong. For each recruited patient, after assessment by an in-house dermatologist, another dermatologist who would practice store-and-forward teledermatology would assess the same patient separately. The primary outcome measured was the concordance of the preferred diagnoses. Factors affecting concordance were evaluated. Results: A total of 190 Asian patients were recruited. The concordance between the teledermatologist and inpatient dermatologists was 80% for the preferred diagnosis, with a kappa coefficient of 0.75 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-0.78). The concordance of differential diagnoses was 97.4%, with a kappa coefficient of 0.76 (95% CI 0.73-0.8). The diagnostic accuracy rates were 68.8% (53/77) for inpatient dermatologists and 59.7% (46/77) for the teledermatologist. Better quality of clinical photographs ( Discussion: Inpatient teledermatology in real-world settings has been found to be reliable and accurate in Asians. Its utilization should be encouraged to enhance specialist accessibility and improve patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.