ArticleApplications in plant sciences
Improving plant DNA metabarcoding accuracy with ecological filters and Angiosperms353: Field and pollen microscopy validation.
Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA metabarcoding reveals key floral resources for native pollinators in post-fire landscapes.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026Article
- Advancing plant DNA barcoding: integrating chloroplast genome sequencing, cryptic diversity discovery and machine learning.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Improving plant DNA metabarcoding accuracy with ecological filters and Angiosperms353: Field and pollen microscopy validation.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Premise: Metabarcoding has become a successful tool for the identification of species in ecological assemblages. However, the usefulness of metabarcoding for identifying plant species has been hampered due to a lack of universal gene regions that work across all taxa, limiting the applications of metabarcoding in ecology. Methods: Here, we outline a spatiotemporal approach that combines Angiosperms353 baits with species distribution models and phenological analyses to generate a list of candidate species to increase metabarcoding accuracy. To evaluate the ecological realism of our framework, we compared the results of DNA metabarcoding pollen loads of wild bumble bees to long-term field observations of bee-plant interactions and visual pollen identification. Results: We show that metabarcoding bumble bee pollen loads was most accurate when combined with a candidate taxa list of plants flowering when the bumble bees were foraging, which improved the accuracy and taxonomic precision of 77.5% of samples relative to non-filtered matches. Discussion: With the proliferation of species occurrence and phenology data and advances in computing and software, spatiotemporal filtering provides an improved approach for interpreting metabarcoding results. Additionally, we demonstrate that Angiosperms353 offers significant promise for metabarcoding projects to reveal species interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.