Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41132905›Full record

ArticleSAGE open nursing

Predictors of Adherence to an Online Prenatal Education Course for Pregnant Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Skarlet Marcell Vásquez, Diana Maria Reyes-Bravo, Mary Luz Jaimes-Valencia, Diana Mercedes Angarita-Macias, Jenifer Katherine Santos-Toloza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Skarlet Marcell VásquezFaculty of Health Sciences, Nursing Program, Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga-UNAB, Floridablanca, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2552-9819
Diana Maria Reyes-BravoFaculty of Health Sciences, Nursing Program, Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga-UNAB, Floridablanca, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2535-473X
Mary Luz Jaimes-ValenciaFaculty of Health Sciences, Nursing Program, Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga-UNAB, Floridablanca, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8339-1988
Diana Mercedes Angarita-MaciasHealth Promotion and Prevention Area, Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander-FOSCAL, Floridablanca, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8618-3620
Jenifer Katherine Santos-TolozaEpidemiological Surveillance Area, Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander-FOSCA, Floridablanca, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1188-0562

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Prenatal education courses for pregnant women appear to be an effective strategy to facilitate maternal adaptation, especially during labor. Consequently, maintaining high adherence rates to these courses is crucial for improving health outcomes in pregnant women and enhancing their experience during the transition through this stage. However, in Latin America, low adherence to in-person prenatal education courses has consistently been reported. On the other hand, adherence to online courses and the factors associated with permanence have been poorly studied in this context. Objective: This study aimed to identify factors that predict pregnant women's adherence to an online prenatal education course. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included pregnant women who voluntarily enrolled in an open-access online prenatal education course between 2020 and 2025. The main outcome was adherence to the course. Sociodemographic variables and pregnancy-related characteristics were considered potential predictors. Population characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics. A logistic regression model was constructed to identify independent predictors of adherence. Results: A total of 1,624 pregnant women were included, 43.59% completed the course. Enrolling in the course between 2023 and 2025 (OR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.57 to 2.41), having a planned pregnancy (OR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.34 to 2.47), having an educational level higher than primary school (OR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.21 to 2.06) and attending more prenatal visits (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.09) were independent predictors of course completion. Conclusion: Fewer than half of the enrolled pregnant women completed the online prenatal education course. Strategies need to be implemented to improve adherence, especially among pregnant women who report unplanned pregnancies, lower educational levels, and fewer prenatal visits.

Indexed as

adherenceonline educationpredictive factorspregnancyprenatal education

Identifiers

PMID41132905
PMCPMC12541190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.