ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Proposal for an efficient, minimal electrodiagnostic protocol for confirmation of clinically diagnosed ulnar nerve entrapment neuropathy at the elbow.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The clinical diagnosis of ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow can reliably be made based on typical clinical symptoms of UNE. In the present study, we constructed an efficient, minimal electrodiagnostic protocol for confirmation of clinically diagnosed UNE. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional cohort observational study was conducted among patients with clinical suspicion of UNE. In all, 210 arms were included, each examined according to a standard neurophysiological protocol. Results: Nerve conduction studies (NCS) indicated abnormalities in 60.5% of the cases. Of these, 84.3% had abnormal NCS results for the abductor digiti quinti muscle (ADV). The first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI) and sensory NCS were abnormal in 68.5 and 59.1% of these cases, respectively. Conclusion: We recommend starting with NCS of the ADV for cases requiring only one abnormal test is needed to confirm the clinical diagnosis of UNE, followed by sensory NCS if the NCS of the ADV is normal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.