Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41132881›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

En bloc resection for primary spinal tumors with huge intrathoracic involvement: a surgical intervention for neurological decompression and oncological control.

Fangzhi Liu, Ben Wang, Jiacheng Liu, Xiaoguang Liu, Fengliang Wu, Hua Zhou, Lei Dang, Yan Li, Yanchao Tang, Xiao Liu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Fangzhi Liu *Orthopedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ben Wang *Orthopedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiacheng LiuOrthopedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaoguang LiuOrthopedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Fengliang WuOrthopedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hua ZhouOrthopedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lei DangOrthopedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yan LiOrthopedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yanchao TangOrthopedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiao LiuOrthopedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Panpan HuOrthopedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zihe LiOrthopedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Feng WeiOrthopedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhongjun LiuOrthopedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Objectives: Given the aggressive nature of primary spinal tumors, postsurgical local recurrence rates remain high. En bloc resection is currently the preferred treatment. However, the presence of a large thoracic cavity mass increases the surgical difficulty, risk, and likelihood of extensive complications. We report diagnostic and therapeutic characteristics, surgical strategies, and perioperative complications of such tumors treated with en bloc resection. Methods: We reviewed 25 patients with primary spinal tumors and extensive thoracic cavity involvement who underwent en bloc resection at our center between 2012 and 2023 with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 1 year. We collected and analyzed data on surgical procedures, complication characteristics, and local tumor control and recurrence, and compared our findings with previous studies. Results: We included 25 patients (14 males and 11 females; mean age, 41.3 years). Of these, 14 patients underwent the first surgery, and 11 experienced recurrences. All patients underwent en bloc resection; 9 and 16 underwent intralesional and extralesional resections, respectively, 16 and 9 underwent posterior-only and combined approaches, respectively. The average surgery duration was 674 min, with an average estimated intraoperative blood loss of 2,388 mL. Eighty complications were recorded; 24 patients (96%) experienced at least one perioperative complication. Conclusion: For primary spinal tumors with huge thoracic cavity involvement, en bloc resection remains the optimal treatment for achieving local tumor control. Suitability for this procedure depends on the patient's fitness for major surgery, the absence of distant metastases, and tumor resectability. Surgery can be performed via posterior-only or combined anteroposterior approaches.

Indexed as

complicationen bloc resectionhuge intrathoracic involvementneurological deficitprimary spinal tumorsrecurrencespinal cord compressionsurgical approach

Identifiers

PMID41132881
PMCPMC12540179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.