Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41132813›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Metabarcoding Reveals Fine Scale Patterns of Trophic Resource Use and Partitioning Along Gradients of Land Use and Deer Density in a Multi-Species Ungulate Community.

Robert Spitzer, Eric Coissac, Annika M Felton, Marietjie Landman, Navinder J Singh, Pierre Taberlet, Fredrik Widemo, Joris P G M Cromsigt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robert SpitzerDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Umeå Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2753-1912
Eric CoissacUniversité Grenoble-Alpes Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA Grenoble France.
Annika M FeltonSouthern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Faculty of Forest Sciences Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Lomma Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5066-1358
Marietjie LandmanCentre for African Conservation Ecology, Department of Zoology Nelson Mandela University Gqeberha South Africa.
Navinder J SinghDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Umeå Sweden.
Pierre TaberletUniversité Grenoble-Alpes Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA Grenoble France.
Fredrik WidemoDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Umeå Sweden.
Joris P G M CromsigtDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Umeå Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across the northern hemisphere, ungulates are expanding in range and abundance, forming novel communities in increasingly human-modified landscapes. These shifts drive new interactions over available food resources, but patterns of resource use and partitioning in Europe's multi-species systems remain poorly understood. This study examined seasonal diets and resource partitioning in diverse cervid communities (moose, roe deer, red deer, and fallow deer) across two Swedish landscapes (coastal-boreal and boreo-nemoral) differing in deer density and land use. Based on their foraging strategies, we expected (Hypothesis 1) diet richness and dietary niche width to be greater in intermediate feeders (red and fallow deer) than in browsers (moose and roe deer), (Hypothesis 2) trophic partitioning between browsers and intermediate feeders to be driven mainly by graminoid use, and (Hypothesis 3) intra- and interspecific overlap to vary with season, deer density, habitat diversity, and proportion of arable land. DNA metabarcoding of 2568 fecal samples showed that deer consumed plants from over 70 families, though diets were typically dominated by fewer than 10.

Indexed as

cervid dietsdietary niche widthdietary overlapDNA metabarcodingtrophic resource partitioning

Identifiers

PMID41132813
PMCPMC12541137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.