ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Trematode Infection Prevalence Increases With Snail Richness: Observations From a 4-Year Study of Snail-Trematode Interactions.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Host-associated mitochondrial structure and broad geographic connectivity in Drepanocephalus associated with migratory cormorants.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026Article
- Trematode recolonization in first intermediate snail hosts after large-scale stream restoration.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Integrating eDNA, molecular cercariometry, and snail surveys enhances characterization of digenetic trematode diversity.Parasitology research · 2026Article
- Land use drives trematode dynamics in a restored stream system.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026Article
- Trematode Infection Prevalence Increases With Snail Richness: Observations From a 4-Year Study of Snail-Trematode Interactions.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digenetic trematodes are valuable study organisms for exploring how biodiversity influences disease. In this study, we investigated the relationship between snail richness and trematode infection prevalence using data from a 4-year study (2019-2022) of eight wetland sites in Alberta, Canada. Trematode species were classified as specialists or generalists at the first-intermediate host level, and generalized linear mixed-effects models were employed to assess the relationship between snail richness and overall, generalist, and specialist infection prevalence. The findings indicate that as snail richness increased, there was a significant increase in the overall and generalist infection prevalence. This trend was also noted for specialist infections but was not significant. A notable decline in infection prevalence was observed for all three categories in the final sampling year compared with the first year. Additionally, we found no relationship between snail richness and trematode richness. Trematode and snail-trematode interaction sample completeness and rarefaction analyses indicated that high sample coverage was obtained, but further trematode species remain to be cataloged. We also uncovered interesting one-off infections that could have important implications for disease monitoring and management strategies that rely on snail hosts, emphasizing the need for continued surveillance of host-parasite relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.