Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41132804›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Spatially Varying Drivers of Temporal β Diversity in Forest Avian Communities.

Jess Dong, Stephen N Matthews, Matthew B Shumar, William E Peterman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jess DongSchool of Environment and Natural Resources Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8055-1886
Stephen N MatthewsSchool of Environment and Natural Resources Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.
Matthew B ShumarSchool of Environment and Natural Resources Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.
William E PetermanSchool of Environment and Natural Resources Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5229-9268

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preserving biodiversity is crucial for ecosystem function, necessitating its measurement and monitoring to comprehend human impacts on the environment. β-diversity, a key metric, can be used to measure changes in community diversity and assemblages over time. Multiple lines of evidence show that climate, land use land cover (LULC), and topography independently influence diversity; more recent work also shows that LULC can decouple climate effects, creating refugia. Spatial structures also affect the relationships between ecological processes and environmental factors. This study uses two discrete generations of breeding bird atlas data in Ohio, 24 years apart, to investigate the effects of environmental changes and spatial heterogeneity on statewide forest bird community diversity. Utilizing machine learning, we identified elevation variability, mean forest patch size, and total forest area as the most significant variables affecting temporal β diversity dissimilarity (referred to as temporal dissimilarity). The smallest changes in temporal dissimilarity occurred in landscapes with increased mean forest patch size, forest class area, and varied elevation. Furthermore, the results revealed a weak interaction between total forest area and elevation variability, with the largest temporal dissimilarity occurring in sites with the highest loss of total forest area and invariable elevation. We pinpointed regions in Ohio experiencing the greatest amount of composition changes in intensified agricultural and developed lands. A geographically weighted regression model indicated that the relationships between temporal dissimilarity and elevation variability, mean forest patch size, total forest area, and annual maximum temperature varied spatially within the state. Our study integrates ecological patterns with spatial patterns, showing that landscapes can interact with climate to mitigate regional climatic impacts and suggest effective conservation areas. Our findings also indicate that the relationships between ecological processes and the environment are not always spatially consistent.

Indexed as

biodiversityclimate changeforestsLULCspatial heterogeneityβ diversity

Identifiers

PMID41132804
PMCPMC12542304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.