Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41132769›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025

Futureproofing the healthcare workforce in Europe: understanding and addressing psychological distress and occupational outcomes.

Pamela Almeida-Meza, Sarah Ledden, Brendan Dempsey, Alexandria Smith, Bethany Croak, Rupa Bhundia, Danielle Lamb, Aiysha Malik, Rosalind Raine, Cassie Redlich and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nurse retention in Europe: why economic evidence matters.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Pamela Almeida-MezaDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Sarah LeddenDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Brendan DempseyDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Alexandria SmithDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Bethany CroakDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Rupa BhundiaDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Danielle LambDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Aiysha MalikWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Geneva, Switzerland.
Rosalind RaineDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Cassie RedlichWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Simon WesselyDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Sharon StevelinkDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Neil GreenbergDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare systems across Europe face a workforce crisis characterised by staff shortages, high turnover, and psychological distress among healthcare workers (HCWs). To understand the true scope and extent of psychological distress and occupational outcomes among HCWs and key areas to target for actionable solutions to this, a comprehensive overview of the evidence is needed. In this Series paper, we have synthesised findings from existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses to assess the prevalence of psychological distress among HCWs in Europe, examine associated risk and protective factors, and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions targeting these. The Series paper shows that HCWs experience high levels of work-related psychological distress, particularly burnout. Organisational factors, such as staff shortages, high workloads, and poor leadership, are key contributors to HCWs psychological distress. Organisational-level, rather than individual-level, interventions showed greater promise in reducing psychological distress and improving occupational outcomes. Perhaps surprisingly, currently published reviews did not focus on diagnosable mental disorders, instead relying on self-report symptom-based measures, likely overestimating prevalence. Our findings show limited research available on psychological distress and occupational outcomes among non-clinical staff, HCWs from ethnic minorities, and countries outside Western Europe. We recommend long-term investment in fostering safe and supportive workplaces and implementing evidence based multi-level mental health initiatives that are co-produced with HCWs. We also advocate for high quality, longitudinal research and policies that prioritise protecting the mental health and occupational safety of HCWs in order to safeguard their wellbeing and futureproof healthcare system sustainability.

Indexed as

BurnoutHealthcare workersPsychological distressWorkforce retentionWork-related stress

Identifiers

PMID41132769
PMCPMC12541638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.