ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025
Long-term outcomes of untreated cerebral cavernous malformations: a prospective, population-based cohort study.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inhibition of MEKK3 Prevents Cerebral Cavernous Malformation Progression Via Restoring Endothelial Integrity and Restricting Microglial Activation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Intervention or Conservative Management for Symptomatic Cerebral Cavernous Malformations: A Prospective, Population-Based Cohort Study.Neurology · 2026Article
- Incidence of cerebral cavernous malformations among adults in Scotland: a prospective, population-based study.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2026Article
- Clinical course and patient-reported outcomes in conservatively managed spinal cavernous malformations.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Treatment of patients with spinal cavernous malformations: a systematic review.Brain & spine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Treatment decisions for cerebral cavernous malformations (CCM) currently rely on risk extrapolation from short-term studies, despite potential variations over time. This study aims to quantify the risks and functional outcomes of untreated CCMs during long-term follow-up. Methods: This population-based study included people aged ≥16 years in Scotland who were newly diagnosed with CCM between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2003 or 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2010, using brain MRI or pathology. We analysed clinical events and functional outcomes using the Oxford Handicap Scale (OHS) during prospective follow-up without CCM intervention until 31 December 2023. The primary outcome was a composite of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) or new, non-haemorrhagic, persistent/progressive focal neurological deficit (FND) definitely or possibly related to CCM (ICH/FND). Findings: Among 300 patients (median age 44 years [IQR 32-57], 159 [53%] female, 48 [16%] brainstem CCM) included during 1999-2003 or 2006-2010, 81 (27%) presented with ICH/FND, 88 (29%) with epileptic seizure(s), and 131 (44%) incidentally. Over 4779 person-years of follow-up (completeness 95%), 44 patients were censored after microsurgical resection (n = 41) and stereotactic radiosurgery (n = 3). During a median untreated follow-up of 15 years (IQR 8-20), 40 (13%) patients experienced ICH/FND, 72 (24%) experienced dependence (OHS score 3-5), and 53 (18%) died (n = 7 [2%] related to CCM). The hazard of recurrent ICH/FND was higher than the first-event hazard (hazard ratio 8.66 [95% CI 4.44-16.90], p < 0.0001). The hazard rate of recurrent ICH/FND declined approximately 50-fold from 0.109 (95% CI 0.074-0.160) over the first five years to 0.002 (0.000-0.015) in the subsequent 20 years (p < 0.0001). Interpretation: The risk of a first ICH/FND from CCM is low, while the risk of recurrence is significantly higher, although the recurrence risk declines dramatically five years after a first ICH/FND. These long-term findings can guide clinical decision-making, and suggest focussing on a 5-year risk horizon rather than extrapolating annual risks to patients' lifetimes. Funding: Medical Research Council, Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government, and Stroke Association.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.