Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41132714›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Integrating multimodal ultrasound imaging and machine learning for predicting luminal and non-luminal breast cancer subtypes.

Yan Fu, Huang Jing Chen, Hao Zhang, Dong Jie Liu, Xi Chen, Cheng Yu Qiu, Wen Wu Lu, Hao Miao Bai, Qiu Wei Li, Guo Xue Li and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yan Fu *Department of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Huang Jing Chen *Department of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Hao ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Dong Jie LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Xi ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Cheng Yu QiuDepartment of Medical Informatics, School of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Wen Wu LuDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Hao Miao BaiDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Qiu Wei LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Guo Xue LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Zi Jun ShenDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Chang Jiang GuDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Yuan Peng ZhangDepartment of Medical Informatics, School of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Xue Jun NiDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives: Breast cancer molecular subtypes significantly influence treatment outcomes and prognoses, necessitating precise differentiation to tailor individualized therapies. This study leverages multimodal ultrasound imaging combined with machine learning to preoperatively classify luminal and non-luminal subtypes, aiming to enhance diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making. Methods: This retrospective study included 247 patients with breast cancer, with 192 meeting the inclusion criteria. Patients were randomly divided into a training set (134 cases) and a validation set (58 cases) in a 7:3 ratio. Image segmentation was conducted using 3D Slicer software, adhering to IBSI-standardized radiomics feature extraction. We constructed four model configurations-monomodal, dual-modal, trimodal, and four-modal-through optimized feature selection. These included monomodal datasets comprising 2D ultrasound (US) images, dual-modal datasets integrating 2D US with color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) (US+CDFI), trimodal datasets incorporating strain elastography (SE) alongside 2D US and CDFI (US+CDFI+SE), and four-modal datasets combining all modalities, including ABVS coronal imaging (US+CDFI+SE+ABVS). Machine learning classifiers such as logistic regression (LR), support vector machines (SVM), AdaBoost (adaptive boosting), random forests(RF), linear discriminant analysis(LDA), and ridge regression were utilized. Results: The four-modal model achieved the highest performance (AUC: 0.947, 95% CI: 0.884-0.986), significantly outperforming the monomodal model (AUC 0.758, ΔAUC +0.189). Multimodal integration progressively enhanced performance: trimodal models surpassed dual-modal and monomodal approaches (AUC 0.865 vs 0.741 and 0.758), and the four-modal framework showed marked improvements in sensitivity (88.4% vs 71.1% for monomodal), specificity (92.7% vs 70.1%), and F1 scores (0.905). Conclusion: This study establishes a multimodal machine learning model integrating advanced ultrasound imaging techniques to preoperatively distinguish luminal from non-luminal breast cancers. The model demonstrates significant potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and generalization, representing a notable advancement in non-invasive breast cancer diagnostics.

Indexed as

automated breast volume scanner (ABVS)breast cancermachine learningmolecular subtypesmultimodal imagingradiomicsultrasound diagnostics

Identifiers

PMID41132714
PMCPMC12541423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.