Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41132712›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Development of an AI-driven digital assistance system for real-time safety evaluation and quality control in laparoscopic liver surgery.

Zi-Yang Peng, Zhi-Bo Wang, Yan Yan, Hao-Qian Peng, Yong-Tai Ma, Yu-Tong Li, Yao-Xing Ren, Jun-Xi Xiang, Kun Guo, Gang Wang and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Zi-Yang PengDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Zhi-Bo WangSchool of Future Technology, National Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery & Regenerative Medicine, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Yan YanHealth Science Center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Hao-Qian PengHealth Science Center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Yong-Tai MaHealth Science Center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Yu-Tong LiHealth Science Center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Yao-Xing RenSchool of Future Technology, National Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery & Regenerative Medicine, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Jun-Xi XiangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Kun GuoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Gang WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery II, Baoji Central Hospital, Baoji, Shaanxi, China.
Jian-Feng DuanDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hanzhong 3201 Hospital, Hanzhong, Shaanxi, China.
Xiao-Wen LiDepartment of Geriatric General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Yu GuanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Xue-Min LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Rong-Qian WuSchool of Future Technology, National Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery & Regenerative Medicine, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Yi LyuSchool of Future Technology, National Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery & Regenerative Medicine, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Li YuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: By performing AI-driven workflow analysis, intelligent surgical systems can provide real-time intraoperative quality control and alerts. We have upgraded an Intelligent Surgical Assistant (ISA) through integrating a redesigned hierarchical recognition algorithm, an expanded surgical dataset, and an optimized real-time intraoperative feedback framework. Objective: We aimed to assess the accuracy of the ISA in real-time instrument tracking, organ segmentation, and phase classification during laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomy. Methods: In this retrospective multi-center analysis, a total of 142861 annotated frames were collected from 403 laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomy videos across 4 centers to build a comprehensive database of surgical video annotations. Each frame was labeled for surgical phase, organs, and instruments. The algorithm in the ISA was retrained using a hybrid deep learning framework integrating instrument tracking, organ segmentation, and phase classification. We then established a scoring system for surgical image recognition and evaluated the algorithm's recognition accuracy and inter-operator consistency across different surgical teams. Results: The upgraded ISA achieved an accuracy of 89% in real-time recognition of instruments and organs. The programmatic phase classification for laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomy reached an average accuracy of 91% (p<0.001), enabling a correct recognition of surgical events. The inter-operator variability in recognition was reduced to 14.3%, highlighting the potential of AI-assisted quality control to standardize intraoperative alerts. Overall, the ISA demonstrated high precision and consistency in phase recognition and operative field evaluation across all phases (accuracy >87%, specificity ~90% in each phase). Notably, critical phases (Phase 1 and Phase 5) were identified with an exceptional accuracy area under the curve (AUC 0.96 in Phase 1; AUC 0.87 in Phase 5), indicating that key surgical procedures could be phased with very low false-alarm rates. Conclusions: The optimized ISA provides a highly accurate real-time interpretation of surgical phases and a strong potential to standardize surgical procedures, thus guaranteeing the outcomes and safety of laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomy.

Indexed as

AI assistancedigital surgeryintraoperative quality controlreal-time safety evaluationsurgical decision support

Identifiers

PMID41132712
PMCPMC12541588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.