Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41132692›Full record

ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Metastable dynamics emerge from local excitatory-inhibitory homeostasis in the cortex at rest.

Francisco Páscoa Dos Santos, Paul F M J Verschure

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Adaptation modulates effective connectivity and network stability.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Francisco Páscoa Dos SantosEodyne Systems SL, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3199-4365
Paul F M J VerschureDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3643-9544

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dynamics of the human cortex are highly metastable, driving the spontaneous exploration of network states. This metastability depends on circuit-level edge-of-bifurcation dynamics, which emerge from firing-rate control through multiple mechanisms of excitatory-inhibitory (E-I) homeostasis. However, it is unclear how these contribute to the metastability of cortical networks. We propose that individual mechanisms of the E-I homeostasis contribute uniquely to the emergence of resting-state dynamics and test this hypothesis in a large-scale model of the human cortex. We show that empirical connectivity and dynamics can only be reproduced when accounting for multiple mechanisms of the E-I homeostasis. More specifically, while the homeostasis of excitation and inhibition enhances metastability, the regulation of intrinsic excitability ensures moderate synchrony, maximizing functional complexity. Furthermore, the modulation bifurcation modulation by the homeostasis of excitation and intrinsic excitability compensates for strong input fluctuations in connector hubs. Importantly, this only occurs in models accounting for local gamma oscillations, suggesting a relationship between E-I balance, gamma rhythms, and metastable dynamics. Altogether, our results show that cortical networks self-organize toward maximal metastability through the multifactor homeostasis of E-I balance. Therefore, the benefits of combining multiple homeostatic mechanisms transcend the circuit level, supporting the metastable dynamics of large-scale cortical networks.

Indexed as

ComplexityCortical networksExcitatory–inhibitory homeostasisHomeostatic plasticityLarge-scale modelingMetastability

Identifiers

PMID41132692
PMCPMC12543307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.