ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Brain connectome from neuronal morphology.
Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quercetin as a Hypothesized Involvement of VMAT2 in Neurodegenerative Diseases-Mechanistic Insight and Therapeutic Applications.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Shared subcortical-default mode morphological dysconnectivity in adolescent bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder and schizophrenia.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Structural MRI of brain similarity networks.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-subject morphological brain networks derived from cross-feature correlation of macroscopic MRI-derived morphological measures provide an important means for studying the brain connectome. However, the validity of this approach remains to be confirmed at the microscopic level. Here, we constructed morphological brain networks at the single-cell level by extending features from macroscopic morphological measures to microscopic descriptions of neuronal morphology. We demonstrated the feasibility and generalizability of the method using neurons in the somatosensory cortex of a rat, neurons over the whole brain of a mouse, and neurons in the middle temporal gyrus (MTG) of a human. We found that interneuron morphological similarity was higher for intra- than interclass connections, depended on cytoarchitectonic, chemoarchitectonic, and laminar classification of neurons (rat), differed between regions with different evolutionary timelines (mouse), and correlated with neuronal axonal projections (mouse). Furthermore, highly connected hub neurons were disproportionately from superficial layers (rat), inhibitory neurons (rat), and subcortical regions (mouse), and exhibited unique morphology. Finally, we demonstrated a more segregated, less integrated, and economic network architecture with worse resistance to targeted attacks for neurons in human MTG than neurons in a mouse's primary visual cortex. Overall, our method provides an alternative avenue to study neuronal wiring diagrams in brains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.