Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41132665›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025

Macrophages and osteoclasts: similarity and divergence between bone phagocytes.

Julia Halper, Bastien Dolfi, Stoyan Ivanov, Maria-Bernadette Madel, Claudine Blin-Wakkach

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julia HalperUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, LP2M, Nice, France.
Bastien DolfiUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, LP2M, Nice, France.
Stoyan IvanovUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, LP2M, Nice, France.
Maria-Bernadette Madel *Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, LP2M, Nice, France.
Claudine Blin-Wakkach *Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, LP2M, Nice, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both macrophages and osteoclasts are vital immune components of the bone microenvironment. While macrophages play an essential role in phagocytosis, pathogen clearance and tissue remodeling, osteoclasts are well described for their bone resorption capacity. However, osteoclasts are much more than bone resorbing cells. While macrophages have been intensively studied as immune cells, the immune function of osteoclasts has long been neglected until recent evidence demonstrated that they play an important role in modulating immune responses. Both macrophages and osteoclasts exhibit the phenotypic and functional characteristic plasticity of the myeloid lineage, which depends on their origin and environment. Besides their common progenitors, osteoclasts and macrophages share several joint mechanisms ranging from cell fusion and phagocytosis to immune function and tissue remodeling. In this review, we discuss and illustrate the functional and characteristic parallels between macrophages and osteoclasts.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesMacrophagesOsteoclastsPhagocytesAnimalsBone RemodelingBone ResorptionHumansPhagocytosisbone formationbone healingbone pathologiesbone phagocytesfusion capacitymacrophagesosteoclastsremodeling

Identifiers

PMID41132665
PMCPMC12540120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.