ReviewJournal of parasitology research2025
Prevalence and Genetic Diversity of
Review in Journal of parasitology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Enteric parasites are the primary cause of diarrheal diseases and other gastrointestinal clinical presentations in Africa and some parts of the world. Objective: This review was aimed at synchronizing data on the genetic diversity of Methods: Thorough searches were performed in the following electronic databases: Medline/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. The search technique encompassed terms associated with " Results: This review shows that 83% (10/12) of the studies considered children as the study population, while 16.7% (2/12) recruited apparently healthy adults. A total of 914 positive cases were genotyped, primarily employing genetic loci such as Conclusion: The findings of this review suggest a relatively high prevalence of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.