ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Diagnostic consistency of GLIM criteria and PG-SGA for malnutrition in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The global state of GLIM criteria in oncology: a bibliometric analysis of research trends (2019-2025).Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Integration of objective nutritional status and tumor burden predicts 5-year survival after gastric cancer surgery: a multicenter real-world study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Pathogenesis, Diagnostic Pathways, and New Therapeutic and Nutritional Strategies for Pancreatic Cancer-Associated Cachexia.Cancers · 2026Review
- Malnutrition predicts severe complications but not survival in laryngeal cancer surgery: a propensity-matched analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- The value of perioperative nutritional risk stratification in the prevention of surgical site infection: precision application from GLIM/PG-SGA to PNI, CONUT, and GNRI.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic consistency between the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria and the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) for identifying malnutrition in patients with pancreatic malignant tumors. Methods: A total of 108 pancreatic cancer patients from our hospital with a Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) 2002 score ≥ 3 were enrolled. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Nutritional risk was assessed using NRS 2002, while malnutrition was evaluated by PG-SGA and GLIM criteria. The diagnostic consistency between GLIM and PG-SGA was analyzed using Cohen's kappa ( Results: The mean NRS 2002 score was 3.37 ± 0.98, with 75.0% (81/108) of patients identified as being at nutritional risk. Significant differences in nutritional risk were observed based on age, Body Mass Index (BMI), tumor stage, and tumor size ( Conclusion: Patients with pancreatic malignant tumors exhibit a high prevalence of nutritional risk and malnutrition. The GLIM criteria and PG-SGA demonstrate good consistency in diagnosing malnutrition in this patient population. Both tools effectively identify patients with functional deficits and poorer clinical outcomes, supporting the utility of GLIM as a practical assessment tool in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.