Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41132514›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025

Navigating and Advancing Market Access for In Vitro Diagnostics: Understanding the Roles of Key Stakeholders and Policy.

Brandon K Hill, Andrea M Prinzi, J R Kane, Amalia K Corby, Barbara D Powe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brandon K HillUS Medical Affairs, bioMérieux, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6509-9302
Andrea M PrinziUS Medical Affairs, bioMérieux, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2949-5484
J R KanePublic Policy and Advocacy, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9698-3465
Amalia K CorbyPublic Policy and Advocacy, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Barbara D PoweUS Market Access, bioMérieux, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid and accurate infectious diseases diagnostics are essential to guide antimicrobial stewardship, combat antimicrobial resistance, and improve patient outcomes. However, the availability, adoption, and sustainability of in vitro diagnostics (IVDs) are challenged by high upfront costs, inconsistent coverage and reimbursement policies, and an evolving regulatory landscape. Market access, payor and health policy, and advocacy are pivotal in shaping whether these technologies reach the patient. It is essential to understand the key components of the market access process-regulatory pathways, coverage, reimbursement, evidence generation, and stakeholder engagement-and to recognize how healthcare providers, payors, patients, and policymakers influence diagnostic accessibility. Clinicians, pharmacists, and laboratory professionals must actively participate in advocacy efforts, leveraging clinical insight and evidence to inform regulation, reimbursement, and guideline inclusion. This article presents a practical overview for advancing IVDs through policy and market access engagement, emphasizing the need for coordinated, evidence-based communication with regulatory bodies, payors, and professional societies.

Indexed as

advocacyhealth policyinfectious diseases diagnosticsin vitro diagnosticsmarket access

Identifiers

PMID41132514
PMCPMC12541712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.