ArticleCureus2025
Overcoming the Complexity of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy in a Patient With Uterine Didelphys and Dual Endometrial Pathology: A Surgical Approach in a Complex Anatomical Variant.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uterine didelphys is a rare Müllerian anomaly occurring in approximately 0.1-0.5% of women. It is characterised by duplicated uterine and cervical structures and presents significant diagnostic and surgical challenges. The coexistence of atypical endometrial hyperplasia, a premalignant lesion with malignant potential, adds further complexity to management. We report a woman in her late 40s with uterine didelphys who had persistent atypical endometrial hyperplasia in one uterus and hyperplasia without atypia in the other despite a hormonal therapy trial. Preoperative imaging, including renal ultrasonography, excluded associated urological anomalies. Definitive management with total laparoscopic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was performed. Intraoperatively, two uteri and cervices were confirmed. The surgery was technically challenging due to the altered pelvic anatomy; however, meticulous dissection with careful ureteric identification enabled safe mobilisation and vascular control. A McCartney tube was utilised to aid fornix identification, maintain pneumoperitoneum after colpotomy, and facilitate secure laparoscopic vault closure. The patient tolerated the procedure well, recovered uneventfully, and was discharged home in good condition. At the six-week follow-up, she remained well with no postoperative complications. Histopathological examination confirmed atypical hyperplasia confined to one uterine cavity and benign endometrium in the other, with no evidence of malignancy. This case highlights the importance of thorough preoperative planning and precise surgical technique in managing Müllerian anomalies. It also highlights the rare coexistence of dual endometrial pathology in uterine didelphys, failure of conservative therapy. It highlights that definitive management can be safely and effectively achieved using a laparoscopic approach, despite the challenges of complex pelvic anatomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.