Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41132449›Full record

ArticleBritish paramedic journal2025

Does critical care paramedic deployment improve delivery of post-resuscitation care following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? A retrospective cohort study.

Alan Cowley, Dan Cody, Paul Rees

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British paramedic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alan CowleySouth East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3093-4395.
Dan CodySouth East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust.
Paul ReesBarts Heart Centre; The Blizard Institute ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6560-6332.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) care bundle is a set of interventions designed by NHS England for use in the post-resuscitation care of patients following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Compliance with these standards is critical in providing optimal, standardised care and in improving outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the impact of critical care paramedics (CCPs) on delivery of post-ROSC care. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted across a large UK ambulance service. All patients with sustained ROSC following resuscitation for OHCA over a one-year period were included. The post-ROSC care delivered to two groups was compared - a standard care group, and a group where a CCP was present. Results: The study included 997 incidents: 106 incidents in the non-CCP group and 891 incidents in the CCP group. The presence of a CCP was associated with a statistically significant increase in compliance with the ROSC bundle. Of incidents with a CCP present, 75% were fully compliant, compared with 64% of incidents without a CCP. The mean percentage compliance across the standards was significantly higher in the CCP group. Secondary outcome analysis showed statistically significant benefits in compliance for several care parameters when a CCP was present. Conclusion: This retrospective study confirms that the presence of a CCP improves delivery of post-ROSC care. This highlights the potential benefits of having CCPs as part of the standard pre-hospital care resuscitation team. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and to examine the relationship between the ROSC bundle and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

cardiac arrestpre-hospitalROSCspecialist paramedic

Identifiers

PMID41132449
PMCPMC12543070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.